From: "\"Tóth Attila\"" <atoth@atoth.sote.hu>
To: gentoo-hardened@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-hardened] Assessing the Tux Strength: Part 2 - Into the Kernel
Date: Fri, 17 Sep 2010 02:04:22 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <c17934f5d92edbc87bf314fdefbcd9be.squirrel@atoth.sote.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4C92A9B8.8000607@edgehp.net>
You 'll have to make a compromise. I run hardened gentoo on my laptop.
Everyday use requires loosening the security settings here-and-there.
--
dr Tóth Attila, Radiológus, 06-20-825-8057, 06-30-5962-962
Attila Toth MD, Radiologist, +36-20-825-8057, +36-30-5962-962
2010.Szeptember 17.(P) 01:35 időpontban Dale Pontius ezt írta:
> On 09/02/10 18:43, Radoslaw Madej wrote:
>> Hi Guys,
>>
>> For anyone interested, I'd like to announce that the second part of my
>> comparison between different Linux distros and their security features
>> (which
>> includes Gentoo Hardened of course! ;) ) can be found here:
>> http://labs.mwrinfosecurity.com/notices/assessing_the_tux_strength_part_2_into_the_kernel/
>>
>> As always - all feedback is appreciated. Also please note that the
>> previous
>> feedback is not to be forgotten and I shall address these
>> ((-fstack-protector
>> vs. -fstack-protector-all, cookie strength and prelink) in my fourth
>> post :)
>>
>> Also - congrats to Zorry for becoming the new Gentoo Hardened lead and
>> thanks
>> for all your support! :)
>>
> I read this today, too. Quite interesting, but it leaves me asking a
> simple question...
>
> I've been running my servers for years on hardened Gentoo, but I always
> figured it would be too problematic for my deskside and laptop machines.
>
> Is this true? Have things gotten better, and is it perfectly reasonable
> to run hardened Gentoo for general purpose use?
>
> Two problem factors... My family likes YouTube and the like, and for my
> job I have to run proprietary binary-only software. (Silicon CAD tools)
>
> Thanks,
> Dale Pontius
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-09-17 0:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-09-02 22:43 [gentoo-hardened] Assessing the Tux Strength: Part 2 - Into the Kernel Radoslaw Madej
2010-09-03 9:56 ` Daniel Kuehn
2010-09-07 22:27 ` pageexec
2010-09-08 15:19 ` radegand
2010-09-16 23:35 ` Dale Pontius
2010-09-17 0:04 ` "Tóth Attila" [this message]
2010-09-17 18:50 ` Radoslaw Madej
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=c17934f5d92edbc87bf314fdefbcd9be.squirrel@atoth.sote.hu \
--to=atoth@atoth.sote.hu \
--cc=gentoo-hardened@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox