From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1C86C139694 for ; Mon, 1 May 2017 15:18:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 12384E0D29; Mon, 1 May 2017 15:18:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mx1.riseup.net (mx1.riseup.net [198.252.153.129]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CACA6E0D05 for ; Mon, 1 May 2017 15:18:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from cotinga.riseup.net (unknown [10.0.1.164]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.riseup.net", Issuer "COMODO RSA Domain Validation Secure Server CA" (verified OK)) by mx1.riseup.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D6CF81A1900 for ; Mon, 1 May 2017 15:18:32 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=riseup.net; s=squak; t=1493651912; bh=Ye0aDHFlFppgNKZ2e7vX6EU4DwZ5u0gjExpeJpt7pTk=; h=Subject:To:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=WkxdFdKqZZ5jP9sVn8wrPsiYLAGKwUuNfqR1f5bkWiV2oqARECF6NcjFXGc55qN3D q1cADtHB0wY2vymCKhHF3S5+xKZq1DFi60zsGq7Z33q3zM9OpEgmQrGOTM9qqK1ygE iM7pe3xcTJkV3lCdy/9IpbZp4JdR2qdKLw+LVAls= Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (Authenticated sender: yandereson) with ESMTPSA id 6EB2A494A4 Subject: Re: [gentoo-hardened] Technical repercussions of grsecurity removal To: gentoo-hardened@lists.gentoo.org References: <20170501093843.GA927@gentoo.org> <20170501132854.98400aa781d29f13457dacd1@gentoo.org> <20170501135808.GA644@gentoo.org> <29deca69-e059-feaf-a312-b0ae53e9610a@riseup.net> From: SK Message-ID: Date: Mon, 1 May 2017 17:21:49 +0200 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-hardened@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-hardened@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Archives-Salt: c34e876d-a627-4a0a-ae3b-0c7c09e4efea X-Archives-Hash: 5e6bbadedad23fe062ca43f967895e4d Shouldn't go to 4.10+, because it will be too much work. Best would be to maintain 4.9 LTS and not bother with 4.10 and all that. On 05/01/2017 04:53 PM, Daniel Cegiełka wrote: > 2017-05-01 16:20 GMT+02:00 SK : >> There is Subgraph that is going to keep maintaining 4.9.X LTS branch >> with grsec & there is minipli[1] that is going to forward 4.9.X LTS >> branch with grsec. >> >> Would be great to join forces to keep 4.9.X LTS alive while porting >> features upstream. > 4.9.* is not a problem, but >=4.10 requires a lot of work, and of > course there is a problem with the KSPP (links kernel.org) > > https://archives.gentoo.org/gentoo-hardened/message/e0f9f37be6c5985acd2f19a316a6fee0 >