public inbox for gentoo-hardened@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Albert Lash <alby@thirteen.net>
To: gentoo-hardened@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-hardened] gcc-config
Date: Sat, 24 Sep 2005 18:39:33 -0400 (EDT)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0509241834290.9983@thirteen.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0509241531450.5944@thirteen.net>

Hello again,

I jumped the gun and attempted to reload the toolchain after changing the
gcc profile to gcc-3.4.4-r1-hardened. I got through
binutils and gcc, then glibc fails, saying it explicity requires SELInux.

Strange thing happened to my gcc profiles too. Running gcc-config shows 5
choices, only gcc-3.4.4-hardened is gone, replaced by gcc-3.4.4-vanilla at
the end. This sort of makes sense.

Currently I am again compiling gcc, hoping that it will do something that
will make glibc compile OK. I selected gcc-3.4.4-hardened-nopie to see if
that helps.

Does

gcc-3.4.4-hardened-nopiessp mean that neither pie or ssp will be
installed, or only ssp? I searched around for an explanation of these
profiles but found none. Might be a good idea for the docs.

Alby

On Sat, 24 Sep 2005, Albert Lash wrote:

> Hello,
>
> I am running gentoo-hardened kernel 2.6.11-r15 on an amd64 system. I have
> followed the convert howto and found it very straightforward and clear.
>
> However, I noticed my list of deps was rather large during a recent emerge
> pretend and so I checked my setup and found SELinux to be not enabled -
>
> !!!SELinux not enabled:...
>
> So I checked my profile, and it was not the hardened profile! I updated
> the profile, and reloaded the profile, and so now when I run sestatus it
> gives me the desired response:
>
> sestatus
> SELinux status:         enabled
> SELinuxfs mount:        /selinux
> Current mode:           permissive
> Policy version:         18
>
> Policy booleans:
> secure_mode             inactive
> ssh_sysadm_login        inactive
> user_ping               inactive
>
> However, when I run gcc-config -l, I am running the vanilla gcc-3.4.4. I
> searched for information on whether I need to be using the hardened and
> can't find much. Do I need to enabled the hardened compiler, and
> re-compile everything under the new selinux profile and policy?
>
> Thank you,
>
> Alby Lash
>
> --
> gentoo-hardened@gentoo.org mailing list
>
-- 
gentoo-hardened@gentoo.org mailing list



  reply	other threads:[~2005-09-24 22:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-09-24 19:37 [gentoo-hardened] gcc-config Albert Lash
2005-09-24 22:39 ` Albert Lash [this message]
2005-09-25 11:44   ` [gentoo-hardened] gcc-hardened Albert Lash
2005-09-25 21:37     ` Chris PeBenito
2005-10-06 18:18   ` [gentoo-hardened] SELinux and Apache - no pid file? Albert Lash
2005-10-07  2:00     ` Chris PeBenito
2005-10-07  2:25       ` Travis Fraser
2005-10-07 12:41         ` Albert Lash
2005-10-15 15:40           ` [gentoo-hardened] AMD64 sys-libs/ss Albert Lash
2005-10-15 17:40             ` Chris PeBenito

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.58.0509241834290.9983@thirteen.net \
    --to=alby@thirteen.net \
    --cc=gentoo-hardened@lists.gentoo.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox