From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Px3DA-0000ab-4c for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 08 Mar 2011 20:08:52 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 012791C05A; Tue, 8 Mar 2011 20:07:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-fx0-f53.google.com (mail-fx0-f53.google.com [209.85.161.53]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A4C691C04C for ; Tue, 8 Mar 2011 20:07:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: by fxm20 with SMTP id 20so8114999fxm.40 for ; Tue, 08 Mar 2011 12:07:30 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from :date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=pgPE/lo7dplyXHYHZY63ytdk+SqZXpo1xXA8RVEU3Qc=; b=RFn6xquMAiLv2n7us2zc0pxXPtklgyZvfs2qIb5QOnk2rtzcpRBhi9gNG7+hp6rKYy JwTl68cA2iZkxZodNJBxqnZf4c0CqL2+pvA2eDg49inswOlUNC2OQ/QIXjGEZh9sO1Ev 5O+NxlG8ieYvG8+V2K9qokgkIStv6ztUBhigw= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=Zo6w4mpHB05LrX4wwpTiwc2JxRcxh3604vqUkvTrrgpPcAlpCqOnXPaMKUyLsTJ1lM AZOopWtQy1nbQG49Y7EypKSonf5rp7aWn1jGQXmn1zrF5dnWJp0DHI+LiUqMqwDiSsy4 3kmf7H240mieN/Z1ydHYJK0gG2htOD+THrzOo= Received: by 10.223.134.85 with SMTP id i21mr2214207fat.25.1299614512698; Tue, 08 Mar 2011 12:01:52 -0800 (PST) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-hardened@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-hardened@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: vapierfilter@gmail.com Received: by 10.223.112.143 with HTTP; Tue, 8 Mar 2011 12:01:08 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20110308195220.GF3281@home.power> References: <20090306215141.GA3005@home.power> <49B19FEB.13855.19525701@pageexec.freemail.hu> <20090306225746.GA2278@home.power> <1236381916.8071.25.camel@hangover> <20110308184041.GE3281@home.power> <20110308195220.GF3281@home.power> From: Mike Frysinger Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2011 15:01:08 -0500 X-Google-Sender-Auth: gn38sE7xyOBEL_BZFrAYRgKQ7RE Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-hardened] 2.6.27-hardened-r8: assassination To: gentoo-hardened@lists.gentoo.org Cc: Alex Efros Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Archives-Salt: X-Archives-Hash: eaa96aabfbfe644f3b307ed14ce1858e On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 2:52 PM, Alex Efros wrote: > On Tue, Mar 08, 2011 at 02:05:46PM -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote: >> if there's a bug in glibc, an actual bug in bugs.g.o needs to be >> opened with real details/patches. =A0otherwise, nothing is going to >> change. > > Actually, from initial discussion I got impression this is *well* known > (at least to PaX/Hardened/Glibc developers) issue, so there unlikely any > needs in opening new bug. And I don't have patch for glibc. If anyone > think it have sense to report this to gentoo's bugzilla - I'll do it. nothing in the e-mail you quoted said this was a kernel bug. it did however say "glibc bug" multiple times. -mike