From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org)
	by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <gentoo-hardened+bounces-2993-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>)
	id 1OUR1b-00017I-7J
	for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 01 Jul 2010 21:10:23 +0000
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A31191C053;
	Thu,  1 Jul 2010 21:09:25 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-iw0-f181.google.com (mail-iw0-f181.google.com [209.85.214.181])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 826931C053
	for <gentoo-hardened@lists.gentoo.org>; Thu,  1 Jul 2010 21:09:25 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by iwn3 with SMTP id 3so2511461iwn.40
        for <gentoo-hardened@lists.gentoo.org>; Thu, 01 Jul 2010 14:09:25 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to
         :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type
         :content-transfer-encoding;
        bh=wp3kSFZJ+hAksyh8n2RrPsmaZACfK1OmhbqdfPHj4Wc=;
        b=m2fl2eyMDKX99ODjof/nivxeMzAeBSQpNxkxo9n1DSUcgBandMzy52mFwCqjX9NTuK
         UO86in2YJgzR07RfNJ3Dcl4zL/Rh5hQx3F6Z9p7eUt7ZncyS02XAi6Qf0M6JtgMO0xU3
         /qNx2trGnKKObMz+zfrVpuXe5tXTYdKKuXfBI=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
        b=eLhUOu3zb+Pb40jAIoW7LZoUVFKsu+sDl8Q5AXeOCYiBfahMHWUAtE6gvkC4WxizdK
         I+3NAbueX2Zwf1pDewGG59gzXty8mZ0v6Y3omthFUU/oCtqqwm+pxZwFAXq3knQldY4z
         Qz4b9ZV0YQDgSJi61GQpMgRveOxHrqL8JRGx0=
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-hardened@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-hardened+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-hardened+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-hardened+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-hardened.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-hardened@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-hardened@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.231.14.194 with SMTP id h2mr68803iba.67.1278018564937; Thu, 01 
	Jul 2010 14:09:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.231.15.203 with HTTP; Thu, 1 Jul 2010 14:09:24 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTin0nnDriqz_scondnf13OEusGDuFf48PbkKkKoB@mail.gmail.com>
References: <201007010846.11482.radegand@o2.pl>
	<AANLkTimMf2IPQIiQr-zaHguP_7ix36SpL61Nh6ZLO-AH@mail.gmail.com>
	<201007012205.22967.radegand@o2.pl>
	<AANLkTin0nnDriqz_scondnf13OEusGDuFf48PbkKkKoB@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 1 Jul 2010 14:09:24 -0700
Message-ID: <AANLkTikwNsiEM27SnoijGmUjxO-Kj246FHqtmfAc4SS9@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-hardened] binary protection mechanisms in different Linux 
	distros
From: Kyle Bader <kyle.bader@gmail.com>
To: gentoo-hardened@lists.gentoo.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Archives-Salt: e3ca893c-6196-4460-aa6d-fef89877329e
X-Archives-Hash: f24bdd6e5a444a15d8ff677d045afca4

On Thu, Jul 1, 2010 at 2:08 PM, Kyle Bader <kyle.bader@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Javier: good point, I haven't really considered the differences between =
the
>> use of =C2=A0fstack-protector and fstack-protector-all - maybe something=
 to do in
>> the future. Would there be a way to find out which option was used on a =
given
>> binary 'post mortem'? (read: after compilation? ;))

Which was mentioned in TFA, my bad.

--=20

Kyle