From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LHAtG-0005oH-7k for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 29 Dec 2008 05:42:10 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5F118E0424; Mon, 29 Dec 2008 05:42:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-bw0-f12.google.com (mail-bw0-f12.google.com [209.85.218.12]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE6F9E0424 for ; Mon, 29 Dec 2008 05:42:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: by bwz5 with SMTP id 5so5805617bwz.10 for ; Sun, 28 Dec 2008 21:42:06 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=NqKqyIQc69+Fv/t9vUF0JDfrhAlCzWKEOPenwMHg2t4=; b=HHXdRT5/vTCsx3BEx9OmjwG97poPjmtKeKkV8/N9arhEduWb8evUdWffWN3VJwHNRq tCXH3BYsULEeGKvug0S2aEGhy5KliFD45A8yB/CMQdSOguq5vsRrIb7EWaNa0DF41uhZ p7Xfxh306RLtyVMm1gLkx2OsLT3mJDgURZW5s= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references; b=MtU0V7wiPV/ReA2pxFjuIlCz9ReT4L3Dbes4FASb/U6tqDol4MA7HN9laQAy/x8my1 T5vp9MtNVS+Tn98b0BXarLe4sek/SrQwMXeMQqOIOgx3YhDTVBeWt5pNQ1u9T+6sdIOe +oHm87F2KtvPEdFAcmVU8gzlQOSfEjfmFTXeY= Received: by 10.103.175.9 with SMTP id c9mr4730328mup.3.1230529325613; Sun, 28 Dec 2008 21:42:05 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.103.93.19 with HTTP; Sun, 28 Dec 2008 21:42:05 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <897813410812282142p763fb224r7002ec6c919c1f20@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2008 06:42:05 +0100 From: "=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Javier_J._Mart=EDnez_Cabez=F3n?=" To: gentoo-hardened@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-hardened] Subject: Hardened Gentoo RSBAC deprecation and removal notice In-Reply-To: <200812281825.55730.gengor@gentoo.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-hardened@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-hardened@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <200812281825.55730.gengor@gentoo.org> X-Archives-Salt: 38a867eb-7a54-4f84-ba9d-b693bdeb481f X-Archives-Hash: e08b9f91b28e8e99910cd4bfc7b185a7 Why do you want to remove all rsbac related documentation?, I think is a non-sense to do this. Documentation does not harm anybody and in case of rsbac is almost nonexistent . I'm an rsbac user (maybe one of the last) and a gentoo hardened one, I have never used gentoo rsbac ebuilds, so for me is not any kind of change. Maybe you could put your opinion in the main page of the mandatory access controls related (something like rsbac is not longer maintained in gentoo so we suggest you to change to by this reason and this one and this one.... blahblahblah). 2008/12/29 Gordon Malm : > Hi all, > > Hardened Gentoo has been without an RSBAC maintainer for quite a long time > now. > > Support for RSBAC in Hardened Gentoo is discontinued effective immediately. > RSBAC-related ebuilds, bugs and documents will begin being purged starting > January 31st, 2009. > > All users of RSBAC in Hardened Gentoo who require mandatory or role based > access control are strongly encouraged to migrate to Grsecurity's RBAC or > SELinux at this time. Anyone wishing to continue using RSBAC will be without > support from the Hardened Gentoo project. > > The RSBAC project itself continues as normal @ http://www.rsbac.org. > > Sincerely, > Gordon Malm (gengor) > >