From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1L54sM-0001hh-3h for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 25 Nov 2008 20:51:14 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5FDDBE0431; Tue, 25 Nov 2008 20:51:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from gv-out-0910.google.com (gv-out-0910.google.com [216.239.58.186]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A13CE0431 for ; Tue, 25 Nov 2008 20:51:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: by gv-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id n8so83259gve.39 for ; Tue, 25 Nov 2008 12:51:10 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=N7WzRY09ovakitGMiX4pA+lCRhSgwM1B2OHMWbtRmsE=; b=JKZ3AmOU0utDbWxFFCSbjAm6nD7q53nJApDa7JkUxpOnYO4Z6kwzuwPb14y8BfA6f2 FMNcSfLu35Iy6Qdxp2EDb/RNTJPeRrTdz88xIu0BvS41Aropzk88Xm6V+b0KBu0sGEZP DZTE1laBsS1cCyArzlD328eC7zs6H1EdfsFDs= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references; b=FNxRpYLqd2cTc/DMuaZyQ4y9eKf5Lb8Ms3HHemxYfLDduseNgAOYApMRkcCq3w8QdO O7mlAMFAV95N35EUYNwq+PiD3SAyWtAibYCe5fwENrMLHHo/Cp71JAN7fGgnghiUoBjg N/5dXg9tegZfg/QIntE3KtdezcYU0DbIOg6cw= Received: by 10.103.252.17 with SMTP id e17mr1790434mus.14.1227646270039; Tue, 25 Nov 2008 12:51:10 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.103.239.6 with HTTP; Tue, 25 Nov 2008 12:51:09 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <897813410811251251i4dcb1fa8keb58dd6533964bda@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2008 21:51:09 +0100 From: "=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Javier_Mart=EDnez?=" To: gentoo-hardened@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-hardened] hardened workstation - is that worth it? In-Reply-To: <200811251839.26200.janklodvan@gmail.com> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-hardened@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-hardened@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <200811251700.45540.janklodvan@gmail.com> <20081125155641.GM1806@home.power> <200811251839.26200.janklodvan@gmail.com> X-Archives-Salt: e6a6e08d-bd65-44b0-aa39-bfe64984e25b X-Archives-Hash: 9843c84e0025e7cfef3a08cf464af675 Benchmarks are very relative, one RSBAC system logging all READ/READ_OPEN requests made (granted or not) is something like a turtle. They depend how did you configure your system. > Also there is another question: has anyone made some benchmarks to see how > much raw computing power (CPU+RAM access, which happen during some purely > computational task) decreases? > >