From: "Javier Martínez" <tazok.id0@gmail.com>
To: gentoo-hardened@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-hardened] hardened workstation - is that worth it?
Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2008 21:36:22 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <897813410811251236o33ba4f18ne8cf71c873c6db4d@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4255c2570811251158n28f3274ch34e87a1a3f1eacb6@mail.gmail.com>
He always could keep running X-window and his window manager (both) in
a chrooted environment, he just protect extremely /dev/mem. Maybe he
would not need /proc filesystem. If security is important why don't
keep running the Xserver isolated (in a virtualbox for example and
hardened with rsbac) and remote users get logged in with xnest through
a ssl tunnel?. With those you get your untrusted users isolated from
main system.
In my opinion getting X-window running is bad in security concerns, by
this reasons:
- First: PaX should be disable in mprotect terms since Xorg needs it
(with it refuse to run) .
- Second: Access to /dev/mem have to be granted and get in mind that
CAP_SYS_RAWIO capability (between others) too, for this reason, one
bug in Xserver will give all control to the attacker (and keep in mind
that with access to /dev/mem all Selinux, rsbac and grsecurity
policies are wasted efforts). Since mprotect protections have to be
disabled pax could not protect you.
- Third: You must assure the access to the display, to make a
keylogger in x-window is easy if there is posibility to connect
untrusted clients to it.
2008/11/25 RB <aoz.syn@gmail.com>:
> On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 08:00, Jan Klod <janklodvan@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Suppose, I want to take some extra precautions and set up PaX&co and MAC on a
>> workstation with Xorg and other nice KDE apps (only some of which should be
>> granted access to files in folder X). I would like to read others opinion, if
>> I can get considerable security improvements or I will have to make that much
>> of exceptions to those good rules, as it makes protection too useless?
>
> KDE (and to a lesser extent X) pretty much nullifies most application
> isolation efforts you're going to make. Even if you ran each
> application under a dedicated user and in its own chroot environment,
> the GUI provides IPC facilites that will readily bypass all your hard
> effort. As with your other email, clicking a link in one app opens a
> browser window in another, regardless of what user separation you
> might have - KDE does this under the covers, since it's what most
> users would actually want, but you perceive it as a security breach.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-11-25 20:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-11-25 15:00 [gentoo-hardened] hardened workstation - is that worth it? Jan Klod
2008-11-25 15:56 ` Alex Efros
2008-11-25 16:39 ` Jan Klod
2008-11-25 20:40 ` Alex Efros
2008-11-25 20:51 ` Javier Martínez
2008-11-25 20:56 ` Alex Efros
2008-11-25 19:58 ` RB
2008-11-25 20:36 ` Javier Martínez [this message]
2008-11-25 21:24 ` Jan Klod
2008-12-05 15:29 ` pageexec
2008-12-05 16:38 ` Brian Kroth
2008-12-05 17:21 ` Javier Martínez
2008-12-05 17:22 ` pageexec
2008-12-05 17:31 ` Javier Martínez
2008-12-05 17:48 ` Ned Ludd
2008-12-05 17:11 ` pageexec
2008-11-25 21:12 ` Jan Klod
2008-11-25 21:47 ` RB
2008-11-25 21:58 ` Jan Klod
2008-11-25 22:11 ` atoth
2008-11-25 22:14 ` RB
2008-11-26 11:39 ` Jan Klod
2008-11-25 23:23 ` Javier Martínez
2008-11-26 2:02 ` [gentoo-hardened] " 7v5w7go9ub0o
2008-11-26 2:34 ` Alex Efros
2008-11-26 17:31 ` 7v5w7go9ub0o
2008-11-26 6:09 ` atoth
2008-11-26 17:41 ` 7v5w7go9ub0o
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=897813410811251236o33ba4f18ne8cf71c873c6db4d@mail.gmail.com \
--to=tazok.id0@gmail.com \
--cc=gentoo-hardened@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox