From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MJmzG-0008MF-Lg for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 25 Jun 2009 11:19:29 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A5D26E038C; Thu, 25 Jun 2009 11:19:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-bw0-f206.google.com (mail-bw0-f206.google.com [209.85.218.206]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65248E038C for ; Thu, 25 Jun 2009 11:19:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: by bwz2 with SMTP id 2so1351840bwz.14 for ; Thu, 25 Jun 2009 04:19:19 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=CTX94lWjLAxYuDMiyh4XEtk764mMaEYvwvQa0nKgBy0=; b=A1AWsdPAnklv1r8W/zQiK/ljxjIVI2EhrJ47LpVPX96gtTmPcZklXQyeiAKEx8Lb+f GQVUPleWLMQb7ne+R7jUAyrCa41wIHSZhS+sL+cNucC9ZakTt3PWCwBF0jJMBO67QYLo iWG0MqGUYSLcCfWvlntaGZCSpRmfoJy3B1+Rk= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=XNE9hX1AU3NGKSYhq6N0NaJeZAbIV40jJLwAvAmfjRxJL2VJisJTshcgHL58OJr0UF 54nOxiBB33M1J2lvnNGRW1ssHWV8Nhexak7L3L+mMVFNH5t87qraXBI7Qh7xsKyUdqqv w3/O9eJVszUNvC8iEts/46AYQ9R/k6bl7svOY= Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-hardened@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-hardened@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.118.70 with SMTP id u6mr2310009bkq.198.1245928759665; Thu, 25 Jun 2009 04:19:19 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4A43594C.5040201@wildgooses.com> References: <4A43594C.5040201@wildgooses.com> Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2009 13:19:19 +0200 Message-ID: <7748d30c0906250419p6da46abale478c544d96d7aed@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: [gentoo-hardened] GCC4 (again...) From: Marcel Kummerow To: gentoo-hardened@lists.gentoo.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e6d6464822a5e2046d2a65ac X-Archives-Salt: 83304093-155d-468d-8c55-abb74ac5489b X-Archives-Hash: c2368d0df614606d8a5ccc781d0bd9e6 --0016e6d6464822a5e2046d2a65ac Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit 2009/6/25 Ed W > [..] > > Can someone please perhaps post a summary of where we are with regards to > GCC4? I think a lot of folks want hardened as a "nice to have", so even a > partial implementation would be nice to have, although also it's important > to understand exactly what you are getting > > Anyone able to provide such a summary please? > > > Thanks > > Ed W > Hi, this Thread may be interesting for you: http://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-t-705939.html --0016e6d6464822a5e2046d2a65ac Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
2009/6/25 Ed W <lists@wildgooses.com>
[..]

Can someone please perhaps post a summary of where we are with regards to G= CC4? =C2=A0I think a lot of folks want hardened as a "nice to have&quo= t;, so even a partial implementation would be nice to have, although also i= t's important to understand exactly what you are getting

Anyone able to provide such a summary please?


Thanks

Ed W


Hi, this Thread may be interesting for you= :

http:= //forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-t-705939.html

--0016e6d6464822a5e2046d2a65ac--