From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from <gentoo-hardened+bounces-3499-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>) id 1Qv6je-0002er-WE for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sun, 21 Aug 2011 12:02:39 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7189621C23D for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Sun, 21 Aug 2011 12:02:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from virtual.dyc.edu (virtual.dyc.edu [67.222.116.22]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E6CA21C023 for <gentoo-hardened@lists.gentoo.org>; Sun, 21 Aug 2011 11:10:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.3.7] (cpe-74-77-238-39.buffalo.res.rr.com [74.77.238.39]) by virtual.dyc.edu (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D68D074C025 for <gentoo-hardened@lists.gentoo.org>; Sun, 21 Aug 2011 07:10:36 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <4E50E7AC.6080906@opensource.dyc.edu> Date: Sun, 21 Aug 2011 07:10:36 -0400 From: "Anthony G. Basile" <basile@opensource.dyc.edu> User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110705 Lightning/1.0b3pre Lanikai/3.1.10 Precedence: bulk List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-hardened@lists.gentoo.org> List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-hardened+help@lists.gentoo.org> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-hardened+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org> List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-hardened+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org> List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-hardened.gentoo.org> X-BeenThere: gentoo-hardened@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-hardened@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-hardened@lists.gentoo.org Subject: [gentoo-hardened] Stabilizing the new selinux profiles X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: X-Archives-Hash: b5b812c40927de09516e13273f108426 Hi everyone, Back in May, I added new feature/selinux profiles which we would like to stabilize soon. These were structured to parallel the selinux/v2refpolicy profiles but with the idea that they could be added as a feature to any existing profile. There are no open bugs out against them, so we are clear to stabilize, but I would like feedback from the community about their use, especially since the next step might be to deprecate the older profiles. (Don't panic! It would not happen anytime soon if at all. And you would get ample warnings.) Either we haven't hit any bugs with the new profiles because of low usage or because there just aren't any, so community feedback about their use and usefulness would be appreciated. Ref. [1] https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=365483 -- Anthony G. Basile, Ph. D. Chair of Information Technology D'Youville College Buffalo, NY 14201 (716) 829-8197