public inbox for gentoo-hardened@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [gentoo-hardened] Remove obsolete pmask entries from profiles
@ 2011-08-14  8:17 Sven Vermeulen
  2011-08-15 14:54 ` Anthony G. Basile
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Sven Vermeulen @ 2011-08-14  8:17 UTC (permalink / raw
  To: gentoo-hardened

Hi guys,

Many hardened profiles still pmask the following GCCs:

=sys-devel/gcc-4.3.2*
=sys-devel/gcc-4.4.1*
=sys-devel/gcc-4.4.3-r2
=sys-devel/gcc-4.4.4

These packages are not available in the tree (nor hardened-dev overlay)
anymore, yet are referenced by

/usr/portage/profiles/selinux/2007.0/x86/hardened/package.mask
/usr/portage/profiles/selinux/2007.0/amd64/hardened/package.mask
/usr/portage/profiles/selinux/v2refpolicy/x86/hardened/package.mask
/usr/portage/profiles/selinux/v2refpolicy/amd64/hardened/package.mask
/usr/portage/profiles/hardened/package.mask
/usr/portage/profiles/hardened/linux/package.mask

Okay if those get removed?

Report courtesy of http://qa-reports.gentoo.org/output/invalid-mask.txt

Wkr,
	Sven Vermeulen



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

* Re: [gentoo-hardened] Remove obsolete pmask entries from profiles
  2011-08-14  8:17 [gentoo-hardened] Remove obsolete pmask entries from profiles Sven Vermeulen
@ 2011-08-15 14:54 ` Anthony G. Basile
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Anthony G. Basile @ 2011-08-15 14:54 UTC (permalink / raw
  To: gentoo-hardened

On 08/14/2011 04:17 AM, Sven Vermeulen wrote:
> Hi guys,
> 
> Many hardened profiles still pmask the following GCCs:
> 
> =sys-devel/gcc-4.3.2*
> =sys-devel/gcc-4.4.1*
> =sys-devel/gcc-4.4.3-r2
> =sys-devel/gcc-4.4.4
> 
> These packages are not available in the tree (nor hardened-dev overlay)
> anymore, yet are referenced by
> 
> /usr/portage/profiles/selinux/2007.0/x86/hardened/package.mask
> /usr/portage/profiles/selinux/2007.0/amd64/hardened/package.mask
> /usr/portage/profiles/selinux/v2refpolicy/x86/hardened/package.mask
> /usr/portage/profiles/selinux/v2refpolicy/amd64/hardened/package.mask
> /usr/portage/profiles/hardened/package.mask
> /usr/portage/profiles/hardened/linux/package.mask
> 
> Okay if those get removed?
> 
> Report courtesy of http://qa-reports.gentoo.org/output/invalid-mask.txt
> 
> Wkr,
> 	Sven Vermeulen

Its lint and can be removed.  It doesn't do any harm masking a package
that doesn't exist, but it does clutter the already hard to read profiles.

-- 
Anthony G. Basile, Ph.D.
Gentoo Linux Developer [Hardened]
E-Mail    : blueness@gentoo.org
GnuPG FP  : 8040 5A4D 8709 21B1 1A88  33CE 979C AF40 D045 5535
GnuPG ID  : D0455535



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2011-08-15 14:55 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2011-08-14  8:17 [gentoo-hardened] Remove obsolete pmask entries from profiles Sven Vermeulen
2011-08-15 14:54 ` Anthony G. Basile

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox