Re: [gentoo-hardened] bonding module auto-loading

["Anthony G. Basile" <blueness@gentoo.org>]

On 05/21/2011 08:36 AM, Ed W wrote:
> Hi
> 
>> Compiling it as a module is the way the devs recommend doing it.
> 
> Which devs?
> 
> Bond should support full configuration through sysfs for some years now?
>  There is no reason that I'm aware of to need it to be a module?
> 
>>  I've
>> been compiling it into my kernels, but then I'm stuck with what I get,
>> as you were.
> 
> It *should* be configurable completely via sysfs (and I think this is
> now the preferred method?).  There are some caveats on the order you do
> things though, eg you need the interface down to change most of the
> settings?
> 
>>  I want the round-robin, what's bothering me is the miimon
>> which I can't change from 0 which means no mii mon which is not good.
> 
> # cat /sys/class/net/bond0/bonding/miimon
> 100
> # cat /sys/class/net/bond0/bonding/mode
> 802.3ad 4
> 
> # cat /sys/class/net/bond1/bonding/mode
> balance-rr 0
> # cat /sys/class/net/bond1/bonding/miimon
> 100
> 
> Not sure what values are sensible though?
> 
> Good luck
> 
> Ed W
> 

In answer to the first question, I was getting my info from memory.  I
remember mpagano quoting it in response to a problem someone else had
with compiling it in.  I remember him saying that using the module was
the only way of setting the parameters.  I might ask him about it later.

As for /sys, thanks for the info!  It worked.  Perhaps my info comes
from the pre /sys days?

100 is reasonable.

-- 
Anthony G. Basile, Ph.D.
Gentoo Linux Developer [Hardened]
E-Mail    : blueness@gentoo.org
GnuPG FP  : 8040 5A4D 8709 21B1 1A88  33CE 979C AF40 D045 5535
GnuPG ID  : D0455535