From: "Anthony G. Basile" <basile@opensource.dyc.edu>
To: gentoo-hardened@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-hardened] SELinux and no-multilib
Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2011 07:41:37 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4D8344F1.50607@opensource.dyc.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110318061231.GB12690@siphos.be>
Hi Sven,
Did you identify what the wierdness was. I'd like to eventually clean
up the profiles. Rather than
[1] default/linux/amd64/10.0
[2] default/linux/amd64/10.0/desktop
[3] default/linux/amd64/10.0/desktop/gnome
[4] default/linux/amd64/10.0/desktop/kde
[5] default/linux/amd64/10.0/developer
[6] default/linux/amd64/10.0/no-multilib
[7] default/linux/amd64/10.0/server
[8] hardened/linux/amd64
[9] hardened/linux/amd64/no-multilib
[10] selinux/2007.0/amd64
[11] selinux/2007.0/amd64/hardened
[12] selinux/v2refpolicy/amd64
[13] selinux/v2refpolicy/amd64/desktop
[14] selinux/v2refpolicy/amd64/developer
[15] selinux/v2refpolicy/amd64/hardened *
[16] selinux/v2refpolicy/amd64/server
I'd like the selinux to conform to the hardened/linux/amd64, ie change
10-16 to just
selinux/v2refpolicy/amd64
selinux/v2refpolicy/amd64/no-multilib
The /desktop /developer /server would not be deprecated, but present
silently as they are for hardened/linux/amd64.
On 03/18/2011 02:12 AM, Sven Vermeulen wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I had no issues turing a no-multilib (hardened/linux/amd64/no-multilib)
> system into a SELinux enabled one. I did not however change profiles, as the
> feedback I've received earlier indicates that the profiles might have
> some... weird things happening ;-)
>
> So I just made local overrides in /etc/portage/profile:
>
> - make.defaults
> USE="selinux -acl"
> FEATURES="selinux sesandbox sfperms"
> PORTAGE_T="portage_t"
> PORTAGE_FETCH_T="portage_fetch_t"
> PORTAGE_SANDBOX_T="portage_sandbox_t"
> - package.mask
> * Unmask sec-policy/*
> * Mask sec-policy/selinux-*-3 and higher (to force the use of the
> 2.20101213 ones)
> * Unmask setools, sepolgen, checkpolicy, libselinux, libsemanage,
> policycoreutils
> - package.use.force
> sys-apps/portage python2
> - package.use.mask
> sys-apps/portage python3
> - profile.bashrc
> SANDBOX_WRITE="${SANDBOXWRITE}:/selinux/"
> SANDBOX_WRITE="${SANDBOXWRITE}:/proc/self/"
> - use.force
> selinux
> - use.mask
> -hardened
> -selinux
> emul-linux-x86
> multilib
> x264
> tcc
>
> Runs in enforcing mode (strict policy), gcc -v shows "--disable-multilib".
>
> Wkr,
> Sven Vermeulen
--
Anthony G. Basile, Ph. D.
Chair of Information Technology
D'Youville College
Buffalo, NY 14201
(716) 829-8197
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-03-18 11:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-03-18 6:12 [gentoo-hardened] SELinux and no-multilib Sven Vermeulen
2011-03-18 11:41 ` Anthony G. Basile [this message]
2011-03-18 15:43 ` Sven Vermeulen
2011-03-18 22:55 ` Anthony G. Basile
2011-03-27 19:42 ` Sven Vermeulen
2011-03-27 20:28 ` Anthony G. Basile
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4D8344F1.50607@opensource.dyc.edu \
--to=basile@opensource.dyc.edu \
--cc=gentoo-hardened@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox