From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NFULn-0005oE-7B for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 01 Dec 2009 15:09:11 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 12F54E0AE2; Tue, 1 Dec 2009 15:08:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.informasoftware.com (mail.informasoftware.com [66.193.169.4]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE3BBE0AE2 for ; Tue, 1 Dec 2009 15:08:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.100.74] ([192.168.100.74] RDNS failed) by mail.informasoftware.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Tue, 1 Dec 2009 10:08:08 -0500 Message-ID: <4B153158.7000800@kutulu.org> Date: Tue, 01 Dec 2009 10:08:08 -0500 From: Mike Edenfield User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.4pre) Gecko/20090915 Thunderbird/3.0b4 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-hardened@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-hardened@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-hardened@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-hardened] Hardened Targets References: <166af1cf0912010240n1e4ee221g9c4a1bfc7e05e833@mail.gmail.com> <44a1f4d20912010611x7b762921r4ca6fe1c7c8567f9@mail.gmail.com> <166af1cf0912010636w1f610934p9fc96a71b3d0662c@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <166af1cf0912010636w1f610934p9fc96a71b3d0662c@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 01 Dec 2009 15:08:08.0013 (UTC) FILETIME=[1702B7D0:01CA7298] X-Archives-Salt: 7f7c9234-30a2-4636-bfdf-0faa34d60fb6 X-Archives-Hash: 691026901b1f0cd8be8d7717b13a723f On 12/1/2009 9:36 AM, Shinkan wrote: > ONE OFF-TOPIC MORE GENERAL QUESTION : > Is there a gentoo hardened toolchain with SSP and PIE BEFORE gcc 4 ? The previous gcc-3.4 based toolchain also supported SSP and PIE, though the SSP implementation was significantly different. gcc 4.x only went "stable" on hardened profiles recently. (The hardened SELinux profile is still using gcc-3.4.6, in fact, though I'm hoping that's just an oversight.) --Mike