From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1N3cyJ-0005EZ-ON for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 29 Oct 2009 21:55:55 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id BEC4AE09C8; Thu, 29 Oct 2009 21:55:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.informasoftware.com (mail.informasoftware.com [66.193.169.4]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93BD2E09C8 for ; Thu, 29 Oct 2009 21:55:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.100.74] ([192.168.100.74] RDNS failed) by mail.informasoftware.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Thu, 29 Oct 2009 17:55:54 -0400 Message-ID: <4AEA0F69.2030505@kutulu.org> Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2009 17:55:53 -0400 From: Mike Edenfield User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.4pre) Gecko/20090915 Thunderbird/3.0b4 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-hardened@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-hardened@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-hardened@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-hardened] gcc-4.3.4 stabilized for a hardened profile? References: <49bf44f10910180842t3d34efd5h20af2a937d75bb1c@mail.gmail.com> <4ADB623D.4040204@orlitzky.com> <49bf44f10910271153p76c152edw2f839c134e467117@mail.gmail.com> <4AE750B4.5030909@orlitzky.com> <4AE77924.7030109@gmail.com> <4AE7B398.3070509@kutulu.org> <4AE7C9A1.4060200@orlitzky.com> In-Reply-To: <4AE7C9A1.4060200@orlitzky.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 29 Oct 2009 21:55:54.0238 (UTC) FILETIME=[9662A1E0:01CA58E2] X-Archives-Salt: 91c1cffe-5ac8-42d6-b54c-7059b7b42832 X-Archives-Hash: a402bc80c5d1ac385fdb39161fe6e80a On 10/28/2009 12:33 AM, Michael Orlitzky wrote: > Mike Edenfield wrote: >> The OOo >> build fails on three separate steps for three seemingly unrelated >> reasons, none of which I have had time to chase down. > OpenOffice fails about an hour into compilation for me, so screw that. > All of my desktop machines are amd64 -- x86 users might have better > luck, especially now that 4.x is stable. My current testing seems to indicate that this is a problem with the OpenOffice build and PaX, not with the hardened toolchain itself -- I was able to build successfully by turning on softmode first. Whether that makes it easier or harder to "fix" the build problems, I dunno. --Mike