public inbox for gentoo-hardened@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Grant <emailgrant@gmail.com>
To: gentoo-hardened@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-hardened] gcc-4.3.4 stabilized for a hardened profile?
Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2009 11:53:41 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <49bf44f10910271153p76c152edw2f839c134e467117@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4ADB623D.4040204@orlitzky.com>

>> I've been stuck on gcc-3.4.6 on my hardened profile system (currently:
>> hardened/linux/amd64/10.0) for a very long time.  Now it looks like
>> gcc-4.3.4 has been stabilized for hardened profiles.  Has anyone
>> tested it?  This system is critical for me, so I've got to be careful.
>>
>> - Grant
>>
>
> A lot of us have been testing the new GCC for a while now using the
> hardened-development overlay. It's as stable as 3.4.x was in my experience.
>
> About a year and a half ago, I reformatted a laptop and started from scratch
> using gcc-4.x from the overlay, because what the hell. Many issues from the
> gcc-3.x era actually cleared up with the new toolchain. Once I convinced
> myself that things were working correctly, I began to migrate "real" systems
> to the development GCC one at a time.
>
> All of my personal machines are using gcc-4.x, and things work much better
> on the desktop than they did with gcc-3.x. Many of our servers have also
> been migrated: web, database, dns, mail, monitoring, firewall, etc. all work
> fine. I have noticed absolutely no difference (either positive or negative)
> on those machines.
>
> In short, switching your default compiler with gcc-config isn't going to
> change anything. Test any new packages/upgrades just as you would have with
> gcc-3.x.

That's great.  I'm up against a mysql upgrade that doesn't want to go
through without the new gcc, so I'm going for it now.

I have 4 desktops on a non-hardened profile and 1 server on a hardened
profile.  I'd love to put the desktops on a hardened profile with this
new gcc.  Can I switch from non-hardened to hardened?

- Grant



  reply	other threads:[~2009-10-27 18:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-10-18 15:42 [gentoo-hardened] gcc-4.3.4 stabilized for a hardened profile? Grant
2009-10-18 15:51 ` Claes Gyllenswärd
2009-10-18 16:18 ` Ed W
2009-10-18 18:45 ` Michael Orlitzky
2009-10-27 18:53   ` Grant [this message]
2009-10-27 19:57     ` Michael Orlitzky
2009-10-27 20:55       ` klondike
2009-10-27 22:53         ` Pavel Labushev
2009-10-27 22:50       ` Pavel Labushev
2009-10-28  2:59         ` Mike Edenfield
2009-10-28  4:33           ` Michael Orlitzky
2009-10-29 21:55             ` Mike Edenfield

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=49bf44f10910271153p76c152edw2f839c134e467117@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=emailgrant@gmail.com \
    --cc=gentoo-hardened@lists.gentoo.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox