From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LRZqi-0000sc-Cs for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 26 Jan 2009 22:22:33 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 702D5E00E5; Mon, 26 Jan 2009 22:22:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mu-out-0910.google.com (mu-out-0910.google.com [209.85.134.185]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F93FE00E5 for ; Mon, 26 Jan 2009 22:22:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mu-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id i2so4645585mue.6 for ; Mon, 26 Jan 2009 14:22:10 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=wt/8UILy9oHmTs7uhnIc3Pod06h6YcY8kjg0R7vB3sQ=; b=J2B9qu7lTepLU27Rsq/Zm8MkrgfWLrlS25HIZgkUUYWqui02Z9TXHlrejLcHF6zfk8 DPXt7hAz1vUSLxVOBKFiJbQFdOT4hsmwBjwnDh68W+kiO6OufsRnDqCJv3oouc6FvnUK UBP5sNYU6v8FV7IyWvdnsYu/r04cVnhFXb7Ws= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=uJcg4BuVLTkjIKbB7GZwfbG0MIDS41CHL/jZjWiTlQPc2bwR9hA1TF/FUNot2jqBZw Uk0lnMbXXq3BZVYf6/3GWXyUL0UIG0bz3J+Ig+UqS6Zd6LLpozVcwl8xeVWgf1D0kcST h5zwI1OEwzfkMVwEjRKSDFFUdt4mTMAJFNcZ4= Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-hardened@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-hardened@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.181.159.11 with SMTP id l11mr47810bko.186.1233008530487; Mon, 26 Jan 2009 14:22:10 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <4255c2570901261252n539649d0lf37f0db9dbf2fa28@mail.gmail.com> References: <49bf44f10901261233y358d3c12r711bcd010b99bcab@mail.gmail.com> <1233002458.2673.3.camel@hangover> <4255c2570901261252n539649d0lf37f0db9dbf2fa28@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 14:22:10 -0800 Message-ID: <49bf44f10901261422l4b263353l53f7c56e4b8058ee@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: [gentoo-hardened] No interfaces in wireshark From: Grant To: gentoo-hardened@lists.gentoo.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: 88f2f3c4-a7ce-41a0-8098-80c061f1823a X-Archives-Hash: 113d64b0fe22852af3a489690e2cc902 >> Probably not. > > ... directly a hardened issue. Given the short history of recent > email traffic, I'd be willing to bet Grant has CONFIG_GRKERNSEC_PROC > or CONFIG_GRKERNSEC_PROC_USER turned on without knowing what it does. > I don't follow Wireshark anymore, but I'd be surprised if they've > abandoned the /proc/net scanning code. > > Grant: in all kindness possible, most of these issues you've posted > lately are what come of blindly applying security policies without > understanding what they do. It's good that you're trying, I just want > to make sure your particular struggles don't reflect the general state > of gentoo-hardened. I'm very sorry everyone, I just needed to log out/ log in after I added my user to the wireshark group. - Grant