From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org)
by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
(envelope-from <gentoo-hardened+bounces-2441-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>)
id 1LRZqi-0000sc-Cs
for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 26 Jan 2009 22:22:33 +0000
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 702D5E00E5;
Mon, 26 Jan 2009 22:22:11 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mu-out-0910.google.com (mu-out-0910.google.com [209.85.134.185])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F93FE00E5
for <gentoo-hardened@lists.gentoo.org>; Mon, 26 Jan 2009 22:22:11 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mu-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id i2so4645585mue.6
for <gentoo-hardened@lists.gentoo.org>; Mon, 26 Jan 2009 14:22:10 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references
:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type
:content-transfer-encoding;
bh=wt/8UILy9oHmTs7uhnIc3Pod06h6YcY8kjg0R7vB3sQ=;
b=J2B9qu7lTepLU27Rsq/Zm8MkrgfWLrlS25HIZgkUUYWqui02Z9TXHlrejLcHF6zfk8
DPXt7hAz1vUSLxVOBKFiJbQFdOT4hsmwBjwnDh68W+kiO6OufsRnDqCJv3oouc6FvnUK
UBP5sNYU6v8FV7IyWvdnsYu/r04cVnhFXb7Ws=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
b=uJcg4BuVLTkjIKbB7GZwfbG0MIDS41CHL/jZjWiTlQPc2bwR9hA1TF/FUNot2jqBZw
Uk0lnMbXXq3BZVYf6/3GWXyUL0UIG0bz3J+Ig+UqS6Zd6LLpozVcwl8xeVWgf1D0kcST
h5zwI1OEwzfkMVwEjRKSDFFUdt4mTMAJFNcZ4=
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-hardened@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-hardened+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-hardened+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-hardened+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-hardened.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-hardened@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-hardened@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.181.159.11 with SMTP id l11mr47810bko.186.1233008530487; Mon,
26 Jan 2009 14:22:10 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <4255c2570901261252n539649d0lf37f0db9dbf2fa28@mail.gmail.com>
References: <49bf44f10901261233y358d3c12r711bcd010b99bcab@mail.gmail.com>
<1233002458.2673.3.camel@hangover>
<4255c2570901261252n539649d0lf37f0db9dbf2fa28@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 14:22:10 -0800
Message-ID: <49bf44f10901261422l4b263353l53f7c56e4b8058ee@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-hardened] No interfaces in wireshark
From: Grant <emailgrant@gmail.com>
To: gentoo-hardened@lists.gentoo.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Archives-Salt: 88f2f3c4-a7ce-41a0-8098-80c061f1823a
X-Archives-Hash: 113d64b0fe22852af3a489690e2cc902
>> Probably not.
>
> ... directly a hardened issue. Given the short history of recent
> email traffic, I'd be willing to bet Grant has CONFIG_GRKERNSEC_PROC
> or CONFIG_GRKERNSEC_PROC_USER turned on without knowing what it does.
> I don't follow Wireshark anymore, but I'd be surprised if they've
> abandoned the /proc/net scanning code.
>
> Grant: in all kindness possible, most of these issues you've posted
> lately are what come of blindly applying security policies without
> understanding what they do. It's good that you're trying, I just want
> to make sure your particular struggles don't reflect the general state
> of gentoo-hardened.
I'm very sorry everyone, I just needed to log out/ log in after I
added my user to the wireshark group.
- Grant