public inbox for gentoo-hardened@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [gentoo-hardened] No interfaces in wireshark
@ 2009-01-26 20:33 Grant
  2009-01-26 20:40 ` Ned Ludd
  2009-01-26 20:47 ` Vlad "SATtva" Miller
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Grant @ 2009-01-26 20:33 UTC (permalink / raw
  To: gentoo-hardened

I've installed wireshark on my laptop but it isn't showing any
interfaces.  I have eth0 and wlan0 (USB wireless).  Could this be a
hardened issue?  There isn't anything in dmesg.

- Grant



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: [gentoo-hardened] No interfaces in wireshark
  2009-01-26 20:33 [gentoo-hardened] No interfaces in wireshark Grant
@ 2009-01-26 20:40 ` Ned Ludd
  2009-01-26 20:48   ` Manuel Leithner
  2009-01-26 20:52   ` RB
  2009-01-26 20:47 ` Vlad "SATtva" Miller
  1 sibling, 2 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Ned Ludd @ 2009-01-26 20:40 UTC (permalink / raw
  To: gentoo-hardened

On Mon, 2009-01-26 at 12:33 -0800, Grant wrote:
> I've installed wireshark on my laptop but it isn't showing any
> interfaces.  I have eth0 and wlan0 (USB wireless).  Could this be a
> hardened issue?  There isn't anything in dmesg.
> 
> - Grant
> 

Probably not.


-- 
Ned Ludd <solar@gentoo.org>
Gentoo Linux




^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: [gentoo-hardened] No interfaces in wireshark
  2009-01-26 20:33 [gentoo-hardened] No interfaces in wireshark Grant
  2009-01-26 20:40 ` Ned Ludd
@ 2009-01-26 20:47 ` Vlad "SATtva" Miller
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Vlad "SATtva" Miller @ 2009-01-26 20:47 UTC (permalink / raw
  To: gentoo-hardened

Grant (27.01.2009 02:33):
> I've installed wireshark on my laptop but it isn't showing any
> interfaces.  I have eth0 and wlan0 (USB wireless).  Could this be a
> hardened issue?  There isn't anything in dmesg.

Add you user to the wireshark group.

-- 
SATtva | security & privacy consulting
www.vladmiller.info | www.pgpru.com




^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: [gentoo-hardened] No interfaces in wireshark
  2009-01-26 20:40 ` Ned Ludd
@ 2009-01-26 20:48   ` Manuel Leithner
  2009-01-26 20:52   ` RB
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Manuel Leithner @ 2009-01-26 20:48 UTC (permalink / raw
  To: gentoo-hardened

On Mon, 26 Jan 2009 21:40:58 +0100, Ned Ludd wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-01-26 at 12:33 -0800, Grant wrote:
> > I've installed wireshark on my laptop but it isn't showing any
> > interfaces.  I have eth0 and wlan0 (USB wireless).  Could this be a
> > hardened issue?  There isn't anything in dmesg.
> > 
> > - Grant
> > 
> 
> Probably not.
> 
> 
> -- 
> Ned Ludd <solar@gentoo.org>
> Gentoo Linux
> 
> 
> 

Correct.
Since Wireshark uses libpcap trickery, you need to be root to run it.
Now, considering the horrible track record of wireshark when it comes to security flaws - which OpenBSD dropped it for, btw - you're probably better off capturing (as root) with dumpcap or tcpdump and then analyzing the traffic in wireshark.

dumpcap -w outfile -i eth0




^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: [gentoo-hardened] No interfaces in wireshark
  2009-01-26 20:40 ` Ned Ludd
  2009-01-26 20:48   ` Manuel Leithner
@ 2009-01-26 20:52   ` RB
  2009-01-26 22:22     ` Grant
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: RB @ 2009-01-26 20:52 UTC (permalink / raw
  To: gentoo-hardened

On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 13:40, Ned Ludd <solar@gentoo.org> wrote:
> Probably not.

... directly a hardened issue.  Given the short history of recent
email traffic, I'd be willing to bet Grant has CONFIG_GRKERNSEC_PROC
or CONFIG_GRKERNSEC_PROC_USER turned on without knowing what it does.
I don't follow Wireshark anymore, but  I'd be surprised if they've
abandoned the /proc/net scanning code.

Grant: in all kindness possible, most of these issues you've posted
lately are what come of blindly applying security policies without
understanding what they do.  It's good that you're trying, I just want
to make sure your particular struggles don't reflect the general state
of gentoo-hardened.


RB



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: [gentoo-hardened] No interfaces in wireshark
  2009-01-26 20:52   ` RB
@ 2009-01-26 22:22     ` Grant
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Grant @ 2009-01-26 22:22 UTC (permalink / raw
  To: gentoo-hardened

>> Probably not.
>
> ... directly a hardened issue.  Given the short history of recent
> email traffic, I'd be willing to bet Grant has CONFIG_GRKERNSEC_PROC
> or CONFIG_GRKERNSEC_PROC_USER turned on without knowing what it does.
> I don't follow Wireshark anymore, but  I'd be surprised if they've
> abandoned the /proc/net scanning code.
>
> Grant: in all kindness possible, most of these issues you've posted
> lately are what come of blindly applying security policies without
> understanding what they do.  It's good that you're trying, I just want
> to make sure your particular struggles don't reflect the general state
> of gentoo-hardened.

I'm very sorry everyone, I just needed to log out/ log in after I
added my user to the wireshark group.

- Grant



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2009-01-26 22:22 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2009-01-26 20:33 [gentoo-hardened] No interfaces in wireshark Grant
2009-01-26 20:40 ` Ned Ludd
2009-01-26 20:48   ` Manuel Leithner
2009-01-26 20:52   ` RB
2009-01-26 22:22     ` Grant
2009-01-26 20:47 ` Vlad "SATtva" Miller

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox