public inbox for gentoo-hardened@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: basile <basile@opensource.dyc.edu>
To: gentoo-hardened@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-hardened] Re: Tin Hat 20090119 released
Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2009 19:28:46 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <49790F3E.7070801@opensource.dyc.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <497762A4.7020305@gmail.com>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1


Hi everyone,

Let me respond to all in one email:


7v5w7go9ub0o wrote:
> THANK YOU for taking the time to post this valuable information!
> Thanks also for sharing your infectious energy with this mailing
> list; it reinforces the importance of keeping hardened Gentoo
> vital!!

Hardened Gentoo is *very* important and I think the team would appreciate
knowing where their work ends up: Besides being the basis of Tin Hat,
it is
also the basis of another project of ours (tor-ramdisk) which uses a
uclibc
(not glibc) based hardened gentoo environment to securely house a tor
relay.
Three of our production servers at D'Youville College are hardened gentoo
(virtual.dyc.edu, moodle.dyc.edu and project.dyc.edu) as are a couple of
internal servers.  I use hardened gentoo when I teach my security course
to demonstrate various hardening techniques.

Clearly, we are heavily invested users.  Yes, keep hardened Gentoo vital!


Gordon Malm wrote:
> I think Tin Hat is a cool project and they are more than welcome to
>
keep us
> abreast of new releases, along with some short release notes.  In
fact, I am
> glad they do.  It is hardly spam.  Thanks Tin Hat peeps and keep up
>
the good
> work!
>
> Gordon Malm (gengor)

Thanks Gordon.  On another note, I am wondering if you and the other
team members
have any thoughts about PaX/Grsecurity possibly being dropped
upstream.  I hate
to see harndened gentoo without it, but there may be no choice.


RijilV wrote:
>
> On a side note, I think a stripped down version of tin hat linux
would be
> really cool - something around 300-400megs (so it could run very
nice on a
> system with a gig of ram).

We were already discussing this for the reasons you mention.


Anthony Basile, Ph.D.
Chair of Information Technology
D'Youville College
Buffalo, NY 14201
USA


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iEYEARECAAYFAkl5Dz0ACgkQl5yvQNBFVTVm9gCeM8/Zn32Lxb+LgTMQfJoJaOdj
pRwAnRHIFB9JSFhsnV/oPNS15AdRLKFZ
=jYHx
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----




  reply	other threads:[~2009-01-23  0:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-01-20 17:35 [gentoo-hardened] Tin Hat 20090119 released basile
2009-01-21  5:21 ` Joseph Raymond
2009-01-21  6:21   ` Gordon Malm
2009-01-21  6:31     ` RijilV
2009-01-21  9:00   ` pageexec
2009-01-21 15:54   ` Javier J. Martínez Cabezón
2009-01-21 18:00 ` [gentoo-hardened] " 7v5w7go9ub0o
2009-01-23  0:28   ` basile [this message]
2009-01-23  0:50     ` Ned Ludd
2009-01-25 18:09     ` pageexec

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=49790F3E.7070801@opensource.dyc.edu \
    --to=basile@opensource.dyc.edu \
    --cc=gentoo-hardened@lists.gentoo.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox