From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LNA9q-0005pc-Uz for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 14 Jan 2009 18:08:03 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6D84AE020B; Wed, 14 Jan 2009 18:08:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r00tworld.com (r00tworld.com [212.85.137.21]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21DC2E020B for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2009 18:08:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by r00tworld.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id n0EI7xwX029732 for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2009 19:07:59 +0100 Received: from r00tworld.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (r00tworld.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 26660-07 for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2009 19:07:57 +0100 (CET) Received: from [192.168.0.198] (x.r00tworld.com [212.85.137.21]) by r00tworld.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id n0EI7u5P029723 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO) for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2009 19:07:57 +0100 From: pageexec@freemail.hu To: gentoo-hardened@lists.gentoo.org Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 19:07:48 +0200 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-hardened@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-hardened@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [gentoo-hardened] Which hardened kernel feature disables wine? Message-ID: <496E29F4.6874.9A0085B@pageexec.freemail.hu> Priority: normal In-reply-to: <49bf44f10901140949n1ebc71ednf7ffd8c1bac05daa@mail.gmail.com> References: <49bf44f10901131100t41a192d8n1d83ba116be42ce2@mail.gmail.com>, <1231905314.4856.11.camel@localhost>, <49bf44f10901140949n1ebc71ednf7ffd8c1bac05daa@mail.gmail.com> X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Windows (4.50 PB1) Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-description: Mail message body X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-2.1.12 (r00tworld.com [212.85.137.21]); Wed, 14 Jan 2009 19:07:57 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: r00tworld Anti-Virus System X-Archives-Salt: a595969a-10f2-475a-91ca-24bdb78b1687 X-Archives-Hash: 8bdca271cf086c0d53e1b0cabbb85c55 On 14 Jan 2009 at 9:49, Grant wrote: > >> Thanks Ned. I get the following but I've only ever issued paxctl > >> referencing /usr/bin/wine-preloader. Can you tell me why the other > >> files might be listed? > >> > >> # qlist -ao | scanelf -f - -q -x > >> --mxe- /opt/emul-linux-x86-java-1.6.0.11/bin/java > > .. > > > > portage and or the toolchain handles them. > > Packages with known problems such as wine should be pax-marked > > If I'm understanding correctly, emul-linux-x86-java, VirtualBox, and > sun-jdk have known problems with pax so portage pax-marks them. > Shouldn't portage pax-mark wine too instead of me doing it manually? yes and ditto for valgrind. bugs.gentoo.org is probably a better place to ask though ;).