From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org)
by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
(envelope-from <gentoo-hardened+bounces-2440-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>)
id 1LRYRc-0007TH-EE
for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 26 Jan 2009 20:52:32 +0000
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B7A81E05AB;
Mon, 26 Jan 2009 20:52:02 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from rv-out-0708.google.com (rv-out-0708.google.com [209.85.198.246])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82D9AE05AB
for <gentoo-hardened@lists.gentoo.org>; Mon, 26 Jan 2009 20:52:02 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by rv-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id b17so6551037rvf.46
for <gentoo-hardened@lists.gentoo.org>; Mon, 26 Jan 2009 12:52:02 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references
:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type
:content-transfer-encoding;
bh=Ttm6d7d9ZtAmGW4KwXahOFC1EoXbRIx2zvqXwuy8dbU=;
b=BnQSIST7XETKvfESCWGTFw+R7K2x1PDYl9lp0mcn5++Az+BV4t/Du74MtnwCmTzcd2
rycty5VtX1MLwZ3UmrSUXkzefyqQJgqYa+iAgOYP5qcRPzN4g1maHR+hu9pQckqUG29I
iy0xnxG2ijjE4uBTxmqV2una2o+jLR9gqN2yU=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
b=CRnG5Kjj5nNcGohAvaXJC14ux+x4uzDKPlaBuR7cB7JKnu1KjakUHEVzrZiUnN/iac
dcr5/uMm2e86BiFT+UlSyyP2ZA64Kz2lXUPuy4DWgftbgTrmE4bcS5PpmuRoQXk5518L
SrDYF1D3xONaDsUHnxItAg0Up4dOPw1LAJf/c=
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-hardened@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-hardened+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-hardened+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-hardened+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-hardened.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-hardened@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-hardened@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.141.136.4 with SMTP id o4mr5022742rvn.13.1233003122080; Mon,
26 Jan 2009 12:52:02 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <1233002458.2673.3.camel@hangover>
References: <49bf44f10901261233y358d3c12r711bcd010b99bcab@mail.gmail.com>
<1233002458.2673.3.camel@hangover>
Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 13:52:02 -0700
Message-ID: <4255c2570901261252n539649d0lf37f0db9dbf2fa28@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-hardened] No interfaces in wireshark
From: RB <aoz.syn@gmail.com>
To: gentoo-hardened@lists.gentoo.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Archives-Salt: 4eb080b0-bdcf-456e-9b5b-479af124f13c
X-Archives-Hash: 46735bee4dc9067a324ba7fce9de789c
On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 13:40, Ned Ludd <solar@gentoo.org> wrote:
> Probably not.
... directly a hardened issue. Given the short history of recent
email traffic, I'd be willing to bet Grant has CONFIG_GRKERNSEC_PROC
or CONFIG_GRKERNSEC_PROC_USER turned on without knowing what it does.
I don't follow Wireshark anymore, but I'd be surprised if they've
abandoned the /proc/net scanning code.
Grant: in all kindness possible, most of these issues you've posted
lately are what come of blindly applying security policies without
understanding what they do. It's good that you're trying, I just want
to make sure your particular struggles don't reflect the general state
of gentoo-hardened.
RB