From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LRYRc-0007TH-EE for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 26 Jan 2009 20:52:32 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B7A81E05AB; Mon, 26 Jan 2009 20:52:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from rv-out-0708.google.com (rv-out-0708.google.com [209.85.198.246]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82D9AE05AB for ; Mon, 26 Jan 2009 20:52:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: by rv-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id b17so6551037rvf.46 for ; Mon, 26 Jan 2009 12:52:02 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=Ttm6d7d9ZtAmGW4KwXahOFC1EoXbRIx2zvqXwuy8dbU=; b=BnQSIST7XETKvfESCWGTFw+R7K2x1PDYl9lp0mcn5++Az+BV4t/Du74MtnwCmTzcd2 rycty5VtX1MLwZ3UmrSUXkzefyqQJgqYa+iAgOYP5qcRPzN4g1maHR+hu9pQckqUG29I iy0xnxG2ijjE4uBTxmqV2una2o+jLR9gqN2yU= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=CRnG5Kjj5nNcGohAvaXJC14ux+x4uzDKPlaBuR7cB7JKnu1KjakUHEVzrZiUnN/iac dcr5/uMm2e86BiFT+UlSyyP2ZA64Kz2lXUPuy4DWgftbgTrmE4bcS5PpmuRoQXk5518L SrDYF1D3xONaDsUHnxItAg0Up4dOPw1LAJf/c= Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-hardened@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-hardened@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.141.136.4 with SMTP id o4mr5022742rvn.13.1233003122080; Mon, 26 Jan 2009 12:52:02 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <1233002458.2673.3.camel@hangover> References: <49bf44f10901261233y358d3c12r711bcd010b99bcab@mail.gmail.com> <1233002458.2673.3.camel@hangover> Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 13:52:02 -0700 Message-ID: <4255c2570901261252n539649d0lf37f0db9dbf2fa28@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: [gentoo-hardened] No interfaces in wireshark From: RB To: gentoo-hardened@lists.gentoo.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: 4eb080b0-bdcf-456e-9b5b-479af124f13c X-Archives-Hash: 46735bee4dc9067a324ba7fce9de789c On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 13:40, Ned Ludd wrote: > Probably not. ... directly a hardened issue. Given the short history of recent email traffic, I'd be willing to bet Grant has CONFIG_GRKERNSEC_PROC or CONFIG_GRKERNSEC_PROC_USER turned on without knowing what it does. I don't follow Wireshark anymore, but I'd be surprised if they've abandoned the /proc/net scanning code. Grant: in all kindness possible, most of these issues you've posted lately are what come of blindly applying security policies without understanding what they do. It's good that you're trying, I just want to make sure your particular struggles don't reflect the general state of gentoo-hardened. RB