Re: [gentoo-hardened] openrc-0.9.8.2 screwed up bonding config

["\"Tóth Attila\"" <atoth@atoth.sote.hu>]

I was lucky to hit this one:
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=400613

Regards:
Dw.
-- 
dr Tóth Attila, Radiológus, 06-20-825-8057
Attila Toth MD, Radiologist, +36-20-825-8057

2012.Január 26.(Cs) 02:15 időpontban "Tóth Attila" ezt írta:
> I'm sorry for being offtopic, but this is the list I can rely on.
> I've just upgraded openrc from 0.9.4 to 0.9.8.2 and my server went
> offline.
> After struggling with the remote console, it turned out, that the new
> openrc system incorrectly builds up my bonding config. It assigns the IP
> address to the eth1 interface and bonding stands there without an IP. In
> addition it also fails to define routes properly.
>
> WHAT? I don't know how many of us will spend significant amount of time
> with it, but that's too much for me.
>
> I see, that conf.d/network took over conf.d/net. My bonding config is
> simple as my finger.
>
> Here is my regular net syntax:
> config_eth0=( "null" )
> config_eth1=( "null" )
> RC_NEED_eth0="net.bond0"
> config_bond0="<myip> netmask 255.255.255.192 brd <mybroadcast>"
> routes_bond0="default gw <mygateway>"
> dns_domain="mydomain"
>
> It works fine, it prevents eth interfaces getting IP and sets bond0 and
> route perfectly.
>
> That would be the network syntax:
> defaultroute="gw <mygateway>"
> ip_bond0="<myiip>/26"
> defaultiproute="via <mygateway>"
> ifup_bond0="ifenslave bond0 eth0 eth1"
>
> It sucks.
> Is there a working simple bonding example?
>
> Please let me know where I can ask for proper help. Gentoo install still
> talks about net. Is there a document on how to set up bonding with the new
> network config syntax?
>
> Ridiculous:
> Dwokfur
> --
> dr Tóth Attila, Radiológus, 06-20-825-8057
> Attila Toth MD, Radiologist, +36-20-825-8057
>
>
>