From: atoth@atoth.sote.hu
To: gentoo-hardened@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-hardened] hardened workstation - is that worth it?
Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2008 23:11:52 +0100 (CET) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3ad6837a38de4c93c4bd93880a71d5db.squirrel@atoth.sote.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200811252158.06957.janklodvan@gmail.com>
Dear Jan,
On Ked, November 25, 2008 22:58, Jan Klod wrote:
> As a conclusion of what I have read this far I can state: hardened OS is
> useless for non-server. Would that be too much? Well, I think, in a "black
IMHO: not useless. Perfect security is non-existent. But there can be some
systems that are more secure compared to others. One should seek after the
highest achievable security in a particular case.
Have you heard the joke about the two monks wandering in the desert?
No?
Suddenly a lion appears in the distance. One of the monks stops and starts
to put on a pair of running shoes. The other starts arguing:
"Let's get moving! We should start running. How fool you are! Do you think
you are faster than the lion if you wear those shoes?"
The other replies:
"I don't have to be faster than the lion. I just have to be faster than
you..."
Regards,
Dw.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-11-25 22:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-11-25 15:00 [gentoo-hardened] hardened workstation - is that worth it? Jan Klod
2008-11-25 15:56 ` Alex Efros
2008-11-25 16:39 ` Jan Klod
2008-11-25 20:40 ` Alex Efros
2008-11-25 20:51 ` Javier Martínez
2008-11-25 20:56 ` Alex Efros
2008-11-25 19:58 ` RB
2008-11-25 20:36 ` Javier Martínez
2008-11-25 21:24 ` Jan Klod
2008-12-05 15:29 ` pageexec
2008-12-05 16:38 ` Brian Kroth
2008-12-05 17:21 ` Javier Martínez
2008-12-05 17:22 ` pageexec
2008-12-05 17:31 ` Javier Martínez
2008-12-05 17:48 ` Ned Ludd
2008-12-05 17:11 ` pageexec
2008-11-25 21:12 ` Jan Klod
2008-11-25 21:47 ` RB
2008-11-25 21:58 ` Jan Klod
2008-11-25 22:11 ` atoth [this message]
2008-11-25 22:14 ` RB
2008-11-26 11:39 ` Jan Klod
2008-11-25 23:23 ` Javier Martínez
2008-11-26 2:02 ` [gentoo-hardened] " 7v5w7go9ub0o
2008-11-26 2:34 ` Alex Efros
2008-11-26 17:31 ` 7v5w7go9ub0o
2008-11-26 6:09 ` atoth
2008-11-26 17:41 ` 7v5w7go9ub0o
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3ad6837a38de4c93c4bd93880a71d5db.squirrel@atoth.sote.hu \
--to=atoth@atoth.sote.hu \
--cc=gentoo-hardened@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox