From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DBAC2138D15 for ; Sun, 12 Jul 2015 23:30:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 57D07E083E; Sun, 12 Jul 2015 23:30:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dent.vctlabs.com (dent.vctlabs.com [68.183.110.161]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 94475E0829 for ; Sun, 12 Jul 2015 23:30:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: by dent.vctlabs.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id B861EC026A; Sun, 12 Jul 2015 16:46:03 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sun, 12 Jul 2015 16:46:03 -0700 From: "S. Lockwood-Childs" To: gentoo-hardened@lists.gentoo.org Subject: [gentoo-hardened] Feedback on article recommending Gentoo for SELinux Message-ID: <20150712234603.GQ2951@dent.vctlabs.com> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-hardened@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-hardened@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Archives-Salt: 3d402249-2548-4362-afb2-1678e659f476 X-Archives-Hash: c25dfb88d72ade0155a1859cdd7c855d I'd appreciate feedback on a blog-style article[1] talking about how CIL is going to improve SELinux policy maintenance, and in particular, the last section where I try to point out how good Gentoo is for experimenting with SELinux technologies. The article is maintained as an rst file in github[2], so corrections/additions could be submitted as a pull request if desired (though plain old mailing list replies are equally welcome). [1] http://vctlabs.com/posts/2015/Jul/12/selinux_cil/ [2] https://github.com/VCTLabs/vct-web/blob/master/content/articles/selinux_cil.rst