* [gentoo-hardened] hardened clang
@ 2014-12-21 20:29 wabenbau
2014-12-23 19:30 ` [gentoo-hardened] " wabenbau
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: wabenbau @ 2014-12-21 20:29 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-hardened
Hi folks,
are there any future plans for hardened clang?
Regards
wabe
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [gentoo-hardened] Re: hardened clang
2014-12-21 20:29 [gentoo-hardened] hardened clang wabenbau
@ 2014-12-23 19:30 ` wabenbau
2014-12-23 20:07 ` Michael Orlitzky
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: wabenbau @ 2014-12-23 19:30 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-hardened
Am Sonntag, 21.12.2014 um 21:29
schrieb <wabenbau@gmail.com>:
> Hi folks,
>
> are there any future plans for hardened clang?
Is my question too unspecific or just too stupid for an answer? ;-)
Regards
wabe
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-hardened] Re: hardened clang
2014-12-23 19:30 ` [gentoo-hardened] " wabenbau
@ 2014-12-23 20:07 ` Michael Orlitzky
2014-12-23 20:50 ` wabenbau
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Michael Orlitzky @ 2014-12-23 20:07 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-hardened
On 12/23/2014 02:30 PM, wabenbau@gmail.com wrote:
>>
>> are there any future plans for hardened clang?
>
> Is my question too unspecific or just too stupid for an answer? ;-)
>
Probably just that we don't want to send 100 "no" replies to the mailing
list. You're stuck waiting for a "yes" instead. If you wait long enough
without a "yes," that's a "no" =)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-hardened] Re: hardened clang
2014-12-23 20:07 ` Michael Orlitzky
@ 2014-12-23 20:50 ` wabenbau
2014-12-23 21:21 ` Magnus Granberg
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: wabenbau @ 2014-12-23 20:50 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-hardened
Am Dienstag, 23.12.2014 um 15:07
schrieb Michael Orlitzky <mjo@gentoo.org>:
> On 12/23/2014 02:30 PM, wabenbau@gmail.com wrote:
> >>
> >> are there any future plans for hardened clang?
> >
> > Is my question too unspecific or just too stupid for an answer? ;-)
> >
>
> Probably just that we don't want to send 100 "no" replies to the
> mailing list. You're stuck waiting for a "yes" instead. If you wait
> long enough without a "yes," that's a "no" =)
>
Ok. So I was just to impatient. THX for the answer.
Regards
wabe
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-hardened] Re: hardened clang
2014-12-23 20:50 ` wabenbau
@ 2014-12-23 21:21 ` Magnus Granberg
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Magnus Granberg @ 2014-12-23 21:21 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-hardened
tisdag 23 december 2014 21.50.58 skrev wabenbau@gmail.com:
> Am Dienstag, 23.12.2014 um 15:07
>
> schrieb Michael Orlitzky <mjo@gentoo.org>:
> > On 12/23/2014 02:30 PM, wabenbau@gmail.com wrote:
> > >> are there any future plans for hardened clang?
> > >
> > > Is my question too unspecific or just too stupid for an answer? ;-)
> >
> > Probably just that we don't want to send 100 "no" replies to the
> > mailing list. You're stuck waiting for a "yes" instead. If you wait
> > long enough without a "yes," that's a "no" =)
>
> Ok. So I was just to impatient. THX for the answer.
>
> Regards
> wabe
I don't have any plans yet to patch clang with hardened features
/Magnus
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2014-12-23 21:23 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2014-12-21 20:29 [gentoo-hardened] hardened clang wabenbau
2014-12-23 19:30 ` [gentoo-hardened] " wabenbau
2014-12-23 20:07 ` Michael Orlitzky
2014-12-23 20:50 ` wabenbau
2014-12-23 21:21 ` Magnus Granberg
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox