From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1RwzIo-0007fh-Lz for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 13 Feb 2012 17:02:58 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3D062E0A65 for ; Mon, 13 Feb 2012 17:02:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80A93E0B28; Mon, 13 Feb 2012 16:12:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from sf.home (unknown [178.125.154.96]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: slyfox) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C49A81B400E; Mon, 13 Feb 2012 16:12:27 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2012 19:16:40 +0300 From: Sergei Trofimovich To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Cc: gentoo-hardened@lists.gentoo.org Subject: [gentoo-hardened] Re: [gentoo-dev] profiles/features/64bit-native/package.use.mask contents redundancy Message-ID: <20120213191640.44a44546@sf.home> In-Reply-To: <4F3823A4.7010008@gentoo.org> References: <20120211173807.4d1a47ae@sf.home> <20120211214848.75eea595@sf.home> <20120211224136.6637e662@sf.home> <20120212211553.2e5ac911@sf.home> <4F3823A4.7010008@gentoo.org> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.10 (GTK+ 2.24.8; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-hardened@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-hardened@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=PGP-SHA1; boundary="Sig_/qHU95Up/kNgBI5GQkb+qP03"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Archives-Salt: 32f2d588-fb5e-4ef5-a3c5-86eb651ff415 X-Archives-Hash: 2dcec98de679124e31562c5aa125edd3 --Sig_/qHU95Up/kNgBI5GQkb+qP03 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, 12 Feb 2012 12:40:04 -0800 Zac Medico wrote: > On 02/12/2012 10:15 AM, Sergei Trofimovich wrote: > > Feature request: > > Can we add a double-inclusion detector for profiles to repoman? >=20 > If it's not too noisy. Right now, profiles.desc contains 83 profiles > with double inclusions like this. See attached data and scripts. Looks nice! 'desktop/*' thing needs serious effort to restructure that. If teams are willing to make things saner, I would go for warning addition (maybe, guarded by --include-dev option). some mips profiles are scary too: http://dev.gentoo.org/~slyfox/profiles_mips.png Another alternative would be to skip double-inclusion of identical profiles= at the portage level, but it sounds very fragile and counterintuitive. Maybe, a bit less fragile, than current state. --=20 Sergei --Sig_/qHU95Up/kNgBI5GQkb+qP03 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAk85N28ACgkQcaHudmEf86qWWwCdFPb88hgFZ6YLVswjQQG7C0sr 0nYAn0QTwvWyXHOvudEyO/49NeDYOnO2 =nfVD -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/qHU95Up/kNgBI5GQkb+qP03--