public inbox for gentoo-hardened@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Brian Kroth <bpkroth@gmail.com>
To: Tom Hendrikx <tom@whyscream.net>
Cc: gentoo-hardened@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-hardened] Please test hardened-sources 2.6.32-r88 and 3.2.2
Date: Thu, 2 Feb 2012 20:50:41 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120203025041.GB3702@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4F2AF51D.8010001@whyscream.net>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 991 bytes --]

Tom Hendrikx <tom@whyscream.net> 2012-02-02 21:42:
> On 27/01/12 14:37, Anthony G. Basile wrote:
>> Hi everyone,
>>
>> I just added hardened-sources 2.6.32-r88 and 3.2.2 to the tree.  They
>> address CVE-2012-0056.  I've tested and they do indeed resist the
>> exploit.  I will be stabilizing them within 24 hours.  However, I feel
>> very uncomfortable doing so because I don't want to trade one set of
>> problems with another.  If anyone has time to test, let me know if you
>> encounter any issues.
>>
>
> I am still using 2.6.* sources here on one machine pending resolution of
> bug https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=386721 (if it will ever
> happen :/ ).

Are those open-vm kernel modules still necessary?  It was my 
understanding that most/all of the guest modules for more efficient 
virtual hardware support were included in the mainline kernel now:
<http://kernelnewbies.org/Linux_2_6_33#head-b1a0ddbc804d228802ce8aebd37d9fd6513ccb01>

Thanks,
Brian

[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]

  parent reply	other threads:[~2012-02-03  2:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-01-27 13:37 [gentoo-hardened] Please test hardened-sources 2.6.32-r88 and 3.2.2 Anthony G. Basile
2012-01-27 16:02 ` "Tóth Attila"
2012-01-27 16:06   ` "Tóth Attila"
2012-01-27 17:38     ` [gentoo-hardened] Please test hardened-sources 2.6.32-r88 and3.2.2 radegand
2012-01-28  5:41       ` Anthony G. Basile
2012-01-28 19:21         ` [gentoo-hardened] " 7v5w7go9ub0o
2012-01-28 18:26           ` pageexec
2012-01-28 20:16             ` 7v5w7go9ub0o
2012-01-28 20:46               ` 7v5w7go9ub0o
2012-01-29 10:38               ` Alex Efros
2012-01-29 17:33                 ` 7v5w7go9ub0o
2012-01-28 20:41         ` [gentoo-hardened] " Radek Madej
2012-01-27 18:18 ` [gentoo-hardened] Re: Please test hardened-sources 2.6.32-r88 and 3.2.2 7v5w7go9ub0o
2012-02-02 20:42 ` [gentoo-hardened] " Tom Hendrikx
2012-02-02 20:47   ` Francisco Blas Izquierdo Riera (klondike)
2012-02-03  2:50   ` Brian Kroth [this message]
2012-02-03 12:37     ` Tom Hendrikx
2012-02-03 14:11       ` Tom Hendrikx

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20120203025041.GB3702@gmail.com \
    --to=bpkroth@gmail.com \
    --cc=gentoo-hardened@lists.gentoo.org \
    --cc=tom@whyscream.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox