From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1QYJlk-0002C2-T5 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sun, 19 Jun 2011 15:18:37 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4FC991C08D; Sun, 19 Jun 2011 15:16:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ew0-f53.google.com (mail-ew0-f53.google.com [209.85.215.53]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB1621C08D for ; Sun, 19 Jun 2011 15:16:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ewy8 with SMTP id 8so978198ewy.40 for ; Sun, 19 Jun 2011 08:16:19 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:sender:date:from:to:subject:message-id :references:mime-version:content-type:content-disposition :in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=u1yBGszpcTBL21c8NXAwSmFW6M5XNNdjmffOWmjESN8=; b=t+tMVb358/mrIEqekhlrkZA3TTk84M407PDexYGrx6fKrtBhMmyeTki3xC4L7vBiyq hubOek1TLe6CH8UlMb2S7skYubliakxy6dbrWRet5kl0wPwx73kZjGKsZ71dOnzoIb/n AI0mbwZu8TbYo6ExCzSrILioCjlZBgrZro9ck= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=sender:date:from:to:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; b=hMFU7YID03CmBcp1GRogbD2L35GXbOiDXzMfBBtwXf43Gern+vZgiw9V7p0F01dM4d nskglQ+vvTwQ6UGlB6oP4ic13RqZUQ0IRMh8po0vV9sd+ZH5MCfgiE5bnGn0vaMnxb/E W4e6ES7SN90FZYIuk7DL27LCmLLwzqGrfGyfs= Received: by 10.213.3.14 with SMTP id 14mr1528253ebl.28.1308496579049; Sun, 19 Jun 2011 08:16:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from siphos.be ([83.101.67.57]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id q16sm102574eef.21.2011.06.19.08.16.17 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sun, 19 Jun 2011 08:16:17 -0700 (PDT) Sender: Sven Vermeulen Date: Sun, 19 Jun 2011 17:15:07 +0200 From: Sven Vermeulen To: gentoo-hardened@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-hardened] SELinux policy for nginx, or include in apache? Message-ID: <20110619151507.GA4651@siphos.be> References: <20110615174526.GA18549@siphos.be> <4DF950E1.9090104@gentoo.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-hardened@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-hardened@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4DF950E1.9090104@gentoo.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Archives-Salt: X-Archives-Hash: 0cb5c68104946e5870825da69744312e On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 08:40:01PM -0400, Anthony G. Basile wrote: [...] > Also, we don't have policies exclusively for lighttpd. Do you know how > that fits in? It's completely covered by sec-policy/selinux-apache. The httpd_t domain works pretty well with lighttpd (running it here) and contains the necessary file context definitions specific for lighttpd. Wkr, Sven Vermeulen