From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MJoqV-0005Z1-Vi for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 25 Jun 2009 13:18:32 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6C28DE032F; Thu, 25 Jun 2009 13:18:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from atlas.fs.tum.de (atlas.fs.tum.de [129.187.202.11]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4571BE032F for ; Thu, 25 Jun 2009 13:18:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from e088.tum.vpn.lrz-muenchen.de (e088.tum.vpn.lrz-muenchen.de [129.187.100.88]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by atlas.fs.tum.de (FachschaftsNachrichtenDienst) with ESMTPSA id 96978195510; Thu, 25 Jun 2009 15:18:29 +0200 (CEST) From: Marcel Meyer To: gentoo-hardened@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-hardened] GCC4 (again...) Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2009 15:18:28 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.10 References: <4A43594C.5040201@wildgooses.com> <7748d30c0906250419p6da46abale478c544d96d7aed@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <7748d30c0906250419p6da46abale478c544d96d7aed@mail.gmail.com> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-hardened@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-hardened@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart27100517.fmETZM2FO3"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200906251518.28243.meyerm@fs.tum.de> X-Archives-Salt: 476cddd0-d425-40ac-9829-aa5a2a372e1d X-Archives-Hash: 64dd229229adff643ad87add7c1483b3 --nextPart27100517.fmETZM2FO3 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Hi, Am Donnerstag, 25. Juni 2009 schrieb Marcel Kummerow: > 2009/6/25 Ed W > > > [..] hardened GCC4 > > > > Anyone able to provide such a summary please? > > http://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-t-705939.html what happens in the future when this overlay will no longer be provided?=20 Will we be able to easily switch to "normal" hardened without overlay (in=20 case it catched up with the overlay) or will this result in a worksome=20 packet cleaning and reemerging by hand? Thank you, Marcel --nextPart27100517.fmETZM2FO3 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.11 (GNU/Linux) iEYEABECAAYFAkpDeSQACgkQJ1G3u1GjcHuxBQCdFqCc3zmXyVSvrvif75VQH8z6 WNkAnivhBiyTrz+8OAICY/+PzSanEg9C =heLl -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart27100517.fmETZM2FO3--