* [gentoo-hardened] resource overstep RLIMIT_CORE @ 2009-01-20 10:40 Jan Klod 2009-01-20 10:49 ` Manuel Leithner 0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread From: Jan Klod @ 2009-01-20 10:40 UTC (permalink / raw To: gentoo-hardened Hi list, could someone explain the meaning and possible causes (if possible) of this message: "denied resource overstep by requesting 4096 for RLIMIT_CORE against limit 0? ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-hardened] resource overstep RLIMIT_CORE 2009-01-20 10:40 [gentoo-hardened] resource overstep RLIMIT_CORE Jan Klod @ 2009-01-20 10:49 ` Manuel Leithner 2009-01-20 11:17 ` Jan Klod 0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread From: Manuel Leithner @ 2009-01-20 10:49 UTC (permalink / raw To: gentoo-hardened On Tue, 20 Jan 2009 11:40:33 +0100, Jan Klod wrote: > Hi list, > > could someone explain the meaning and possible causes (if possible) of this > message: "denied resource overstep by requesting 4096 for RLIMIT_CORE against > limit 0? > > One of your processes crashed and tried to dump its core, but since the RLIMIT_CORE is set to 0 (i. e. no core dumps are to be created), it can't do so. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-hardened] resource overstep RLIMIT_CORE 2009-01-20 10:49 ` Manuel Leithner @ 2009-01-20 11:17 ` Jan Klod 2009-01-20 15:45 ` Ned Ludd 0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread From: Jan Klod @ 2009-01-20 11:17 UTC (permalink / raw To: gentoo-hardened On Tuesday 20 January 2009 10:49:24 Manuel Leithner wrote: > On Tue, 20 Jan 2009 11:40:33 +0100, Jan Klod wrote: > > Hi list, > > > > could someone explain the meaning and possible causes (if possible) of > > this message: "denied resource overstep by requesting 4096 for > > RLIMIT_CORE against limit 0? > > One of your processes crashed and tried to dump its core, but since the > RLIMIT_CORE is set to 0 (i. e. no core dumps are to be created), it can't > do so. Ah, so it is just a secondary problem. Its ssmtp crashing. First it makes a segfault, then receives signal 11 by grsec, then overstep. Anyone here using it with grsec? ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-hardened] resource overstep RLIMIT_CORE 2009-01-20 11:17 ` Jan Klod @ 2009-01-20 15:45 ` Ned Ludd 2009-01-20 19:25 ` Jan Klod 2009-01-21 10:16 ` Jan Klod 0 siblings, 2 replies; 7+ messages in thread From: Ned Ludd @ 2009-01-20 15:45 UTC (permalink / raw To: gentoo-hardened On Tue, 2009-01-20 at 11:17 +0000, Jan Klod wrote: > On Tuesday 20 January 2009 10:49:24 Manuel Leithner wrote: > > On Tue, 20 Jan 2009 11:40:33 +0100, Jan Klod wrote: > > > Hi list, > > > > > > could someone explain the meaning and possible causes (if possible) of > > > this message: "denied resource overstep by requesting 4096 for > > > RLIMIT_CORE against limit 0? > > > > One of your processes crashed and tried to dump its core, but since the > > RLIMIT_CORE is set to 0 (i. e. no core dumps are to be created), it can't > > do so. > > Ah, so it is just a secondary problem. Its ssmtp crashing. First it makes a > segfault, then receives signal 11 by grsec, then overstep. A segfault is signal 11. It's not two events but one. And grsec is not sending the signal in anyway but rather just logging that it happened. > Anyone here using > it with grsec? Lots of people. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-hardened] resource overstep RLIMIT_CORE 2009-01-20 15:45 ` Ned Ludd @ 2009-01-20 19:25 ` Jan Klod 2009-01-21 0:30 ` Magnus Granberg 2009-01-21 10:16 ` Jan Klod 1 sibling, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread From: Jan Klod @ 2009-01-20 19:25 UTC (permalink / raw To: gentoo-hardened On Tuesday 20 January 2009 15:45:25 Ned Ludd wrote: > On Tue, 2009-01-20 at 11:17 +0000, Jan Klod wrote: > > On Tuesday 20 January 2009 10:49:24 Manuel Leithner wrote: > > > On Tue, 20 Jan 2009 11:40:33 +0100, Jan Klod wrote: > > > > Hi list, > > > > > > > > could someone explain the meaning and possible causes (if possible) > > > > of this message: "denied resource overstep by requesting 4096 for > > > > RLIMIT_CORE against limit 0? > > > > > > One of your processes crashed and tried to dump its core, but since the > > > RLIMIT_CORE is set to 0 (i. e. no core dumps are to be created), it > > > can't do so. > > > > Ah, so it is just a secondary problem. Its ssmtp crashing. First it makes > > a segfault, then receives signal 11 by grsec, then overstep. > > A segfault is signal 11. It's not two events but one. And grsec is not > sending the signal in anyway but rather just logging that it happened. > > > Anyone here using > > it with grsec? > > Lots of people. In my case it is 2.62-r{2,5} on hardened-sources-2.6.25 with most of grsecurity options enabled and I can't get it working... Maybe someone of those lots has some suggestion? How to find out the problem or what is known to work? ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-hardened] resource overstep RLIMIT_CORE 2009-01-20 19:25 ` Jan Klod @ 2009-01-21 0:30 ` Magnus Granberg 0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread From: Magnus Granberg @ 2009-01-21 0:30 UTC (permalink / raw To: gentoo-hardened On Tuesday 20 January 2009 20.25.22 Jan Klod wrote: > On Tuesday 20 January 2009 15:45:25 Ned Ludd wrote: > > On Tue, 2009-01-20 at 11:17 +0000, Jan Klod wrote: > > > On Tuesday 20 January 2009 10:49:24 Manuel Leithner wrote: > > > > On Tue, 20 Jan 2009 11:40:33 +0100, Jan Klod wrote: > > > > > Hi list, > > > > > > > > > > could someone explain the meaning and possible causes (if possible) > > > > > of this message: "denied resource overstep by requesting 4096 for > > > > > RLIMIT_CORE against limit 0? > > > > > > > > One of your processes crashed and tried to dump its core, but since > > > > the RLIMIT_CORE is set to 0 (i. e. no core dumps are to be created), > > > > it can't do so. > > > > > > Ah, so it is just a secondary problem. Its ssmtp crashing. First it > > > makes a segfault, then receives signal 11 by grsec, then overstep. > > > > A segfault is signal 11. It's not two events but one. And grsec is not > > sending the signal in anyway but rather just logging that it happened. > > > > > Anyone here using > > > it with grsec? > > > > Lots of people. > > In my case it is 2.62-r{2,5} on hardened-sources-2.6.25 with most of > grsecurity options enabled and I can't get it working... Maybe someone of > those lots has some suggestion? How to find out the problem or what is > known to work? http://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-t-728429.html http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=253733 http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=254843 We have some RLIMIT bug in the hardened-sources Gordon Malm know more about it. /Zorry ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-hardened] resource overstep RLIMIT_CORE 2009-01-20 15:45 ` Ned Ludd 2009-01-20 19:25 ` Jan Klod @ 2009-01-21 10:16 ` Jan Klod 1 sibling, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread From: Jan Klod @ 2009-01-21 10:16 UTC (permalink / raw To: gentoo-hardened On Tuesday 20 January 2009 15:45:25 Ned Ludd wrote: > On Tue, 2009-01-20 at 11:17 +0000, Jan Klod wrote: > > On Tuesday 20 January 2009 10:49:24 Manuel Leithner wrote: > > > On Tue, 20 Jan 2009 11:40:33 +0100, Jan Klod wrote: > > > > Hi list, > > > > > > > > could someone explain the meaning and possible causes (if possible) > > > > of this message: "denied resource overstep by requesting 4096 for > > > > RLIMIT_CORE against limit 0? > > > > > > One of your processes crashed and tried to dump its core, but since the > > > RLIMIT_CORE is set to 0 (i. e. no core dumps are to be created), it > > > can't do so. > > > > Ah, so it is just a secondary problem. Its ssmtp crashing. First it makes > > a segfault, then receives signal 11 by grsec, then overstep. > > A segfault is signal 11. It's not two events but one. And grsec is not > sending the signal in anyway but rather just logging that it happened. > > > Anyone here using > > it with grsec? > > Lots of people. Ok, my advice is: don't use some of characters \#,\$,\,, maybe \( in password for ssmtp... ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2009-01-21 10:16 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 7+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2009-01-20 10:40 [gentoo-hardened] resource overstep RLIMIT_CORE Jan Klod 2009-01-20 10:49 ` Manuel Leithner 2009-01-20 11:17 ` Jan Klod 2009-01-20 15:45 ` Ned Ludd 2009-01-20 19:25 ` Jan Klod 2009-01-21 0:30 ` Magnus Granberg 2009-01-21 10:16 ` Jan Klod
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox