From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.54) id 1F82vP-0006Qy-ST for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 11 Feb 2006 22:09:04 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with SMTP id k1BM77dc027035; Sat, 11 Feb 2006 22:07:07 GMT Received: from sunspire.org ([86.120.220.17]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with SMTP id k1BM76hk005197 for ; Sat, 11 Feb 2006 22:07:06 GMT Received: (qmail 567 invoked from network); 11 Feb 2006 22:07:05 -0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.0 (2005-09-13) on starshine.sunspire.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=4.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL autolearn=disabled version=3.1.0 Received: from unknown (HELO peter) (prodan@10.0.2.6) by 86.120.220.17 with ESMTPA; 11 Feb 2006 22:07:02 -0000 Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2006 00:06:52 +0200 From: Petre Rodan To: gentoo-hardened@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-hardened] lvm2 and selinux? Message-ID: <20060211220652.GA4003@peter.sunspire.org> Mail-Followup-To: gentoo-hardened@lists.gentoo.org References: <43EAFFD3.3040700@gmail.com> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-hardened@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-hardened@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="vkogqOf2sHV7VnPd" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <43EAFFD3.3040700@gmail.com> User-Agent: mutt-ng/devel (Linux) X-Archives-Salt: 35b3b2c0-47c2-4684-bb47-e04c548a48e7 X-Archives-Hash: 60c852a13c11719f786ebf6446764ece --vkogqOf2sHV7VnPd Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, On Thu, Feb 09, 2006 at 10:39:47AM +0200, Jukka Palko wrote: [..]=20 > Also a bit curious on why the selinux-lvm ebuild isn't in dependencies > when installing/upgrading lvm2 on an selinux system. Doesn't it provide > the necessary policy datas? I do not have any LVM system to test the policy with, so I'm unsure of how = gentoo-worthy it is. The only part of the policy I was interested in was that related to dmsetup= /cryptsetup. If you feel that selinux-lvm does it's job well, please open a bug report a= bout adding the policy to RDEPENDs and assign it to lvm maintainers. bye, peter --=20 petre rodan Developer, Hardened Gentoo Linux=20 --vkogqOf2sHV7VnPd Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2-ecc0.1.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFD7l/8GSBEIeh4AEYRAprlAJ0WVhcl5XYjst2JZuIYshAvq9NxWQCeM3xv iPHBVUQpuyArqAFbfWlhWoI= =f2Ib -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --vkogqOf2sHV7VnPd-- -- gentoo-hardened@gentoo.org mailing list