From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.54) id 1F4k9R-0001XS-4Y for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 02 Feb 2006 19:29:53 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with SMTP id k12JRj6u012863; Thu, 2 Feb 2006 19:27:45 GMT Received: from mail-relay-3.tiscali.it (mail-relay-3.tiscali.it [213.205.33.43]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id k12JRjUR032692 for ; Thu, 2 Feb 2006 19:27:45 GMT Received: from c1358217.kevquinn.com (84.222.85.23) by mail-relay-3.tiscali.it (7.2.069.1) id 438439FE008C4E45 for gentoo-hardened@lists.gentoo.org; Thu, 2 Feb 2006 20:27:44 +0100 Date: Thu, 2 Feb 2006 20:35:12 +0100 From: "Kevin F. Quinn (Gentoo)" To: gentoo-hardened@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-hardened] Problems compiling xen - please help... Message-ID: <20060202203512.199ce023@c1358217.kevquinn.com> In-Reply-To: <1138904326.16448.3.camel@localhost> References: <43E21F59.9070709@wildgooses.com> <20060202183402.5be7ea34@c1358217.kevquinn.com> <43E246DC.3090006@wildgooses.com> <43E24869.9080303@wildgooses.com> <1138904326.16448.3.camel@localhost> X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 2.0.0-rc4 (GTK+ 2.8.11; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-hardened@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-hardened@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary=Sig_0NO5ZNxVL8fAeGEOtsbnXZn; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=PGP-SHA1 X-Archives-Salt: 9f996d1d-2059-4d29-a07a-90f6edf132be X-Archives-Hash: 8a2621a1ff43effde34a5d223bc7126d --Sig_0NO5ZNxVL8fAeGEOtsbnXZn Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, 02 Feb 2006 13:18:46 -0500 Ned Ludd wrote: > On Thu, 2006-02-02 at 17:59 +0000, Ed W wrote: > > Heads up then that when switching compiler to the non-hardened one > > it makes sense to blow away the ccache of disable it's use. >=20 > That probably makes sense for any time a gcc-config switch happens. > You should probably file a bug about that for the maintainer of > gcc-config. ccache doesn't take account of anything other than the built-in specs files and stuff specified via --specs - we could just patch ccache to pay attention to GCC_SPECS as well. I'll take a look. --=20 Kevin F. Quinn --Sig_0NO5ZNxVL8fAeGEOtsbnXZn Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFD4l729G2S8dekcG0RAhQmAKCU+UBUKAQzQOM+VrJnj6hLOCGT0QCgll4a bnx732eozbPwcaL0IjWKbf0= =NwUG -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_0NO5ZNxVL8fAeGEOtsbnXZn-- -- gentoo-hardened@gentoo.org mailing list