From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.54) id 1F4lCi-0001yR-QU for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 02 Feb 2006 20:37:21 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with SMTP id k12KZaJK024094; Thu, 2 Feb 2006 20:35:36 GMT Received: from mail.epproach.net (mail.epproach.net [64.192.56.25]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id k12KZYrU022642 for ; Thu, 2 Feb 2006 20:35:35 GMT Received: (qmail 26243 invoked by uid 210); 2 Feb 2006 15:35:33 -0500 Received: from 64.192.55.242 by mail (envelope-from , uid 201) with qmail-scanner-1.25st (clamdscan: 0.88/1266. f-prot: 4.5.4/3.16.6. spamassassin: 3.0.4. perlscan: 1.25st. Clear:RC:1(64.192.55.242):. Processed in 0.025409 secs); 02 Feb 2006 20:35:33 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?64.192.55.242?) (64.192.55.242) by 0 with SMTP; 2 Feb 2006 15:35:33 -0500 Subject: Re: [gentoo-hardened] Problems compiling xen - please help... From: Ned Ludd To: gentoo-hardened@lists.gentoo.org In-Reply-To: <20060202203512.199ce023@c1358217.kevquinn.com> References: <43E21F59.9070709@wildgooses.com> <20060202183402.5be7ea34@c1358217.kevquinn.com> <43E246DC.3090006@wildgooses.com> <43E24869.9080303@wildgooses.com> <1138904326.16448.3.camel@localhost> <20060202203512.199ce023@c1358217.kevquinn.com> Content-Type: text/plain Organization: Gentoo Linux Date: Thu, 02 Feb 2006 15:35:33 -0500 Message-Id: <1138912533.12457.14.camel@localhost> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-hardened@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-hardened@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.4.2.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: cc53c519-f66c-4faa-9142-c0827056e8b4 X-Archives-Hash: 664fe229d295af6dc0e349730aec23a9 On Thu, 2006-02-02 at 20:35 +0100, Kevin F. Quinn (Gentoo) wrote: > On Thu, 02 Feb 2006 13:18:46 -0500 > Ned Ludd wrote: > > > On Thu, 2006-02-02 at 17:59 +0000, Ed W wrote: > > > Heads up then that when switching compiler to the non-hardened one > > > it makes sense to blow away the ccache of disable it's use. > > > > That probably makes sense for any time a gcc-config switch happens. > > You should probably file a bug about that for the maintainer of > > gcc-config. > > ccache doesn't take account of anything other than the built-in specs > files and stuff specified via --specs - we could just patch > ccache to pay attention to GCC_SPECS as well. I'll take a look. Ok cool but keep in mind. USE=-hardened emerge gcc gcc-config 1 echo $GCC_SPECS USE=hardened emerge gcc gcc-config 1 echo $GCC_SPECS Both times it shall be "" with the same version of gcc. -- Ned Ludd Gentoo Linux -- gentoo-hardened@gentoo.org mailing list