From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1EUTwm-0005kC-6C for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 25 Oct 2005 18:54:56 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with SMTP id j9PIqKvY020249; Tue, 25 Oct 2005 18:52:20 GMT Received: from mail01.emarketsouth.com (mail01.emarketsouth.com [208.247.233.6]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with SMTP id j9PIqJHD023534 for ; Tue, 25 Oct 2005 18:52:19 GMT Received: (qmail 10203 invoked by uid 399); 25 Oct 2005 18:51:01 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO alto) (64.192.54.4) by mail01.emarketsouth.com with SMTP; 25 Oct 2005 18:51:01 -0000 Subject: Re: [gentoo-hardened] mysql 4.1 requires shlib_t:file execmod? From: solar To: gentoo-hardened@lists.gentoo.org In-Reply-To: <435D84D9.26102.B0B60317@pageexec.freemail.hu> References: <435D6D0E.27558.B0591158@pageexec.freemail.hu> <435D84D9.26102.B0B60317@pageexec.freemail.hu> Content-Type: text/plain Organization: Gentoo Linux Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2005 14:52:18 -0400 Message-Id: <1130266338.8904.65.camel@alto> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-hardened@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-hardened@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.3 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: 54a2b497-d4d1-4f72-90ea-5fa420b17d72 X-Archives-Hash: 7a9360f0db9b5d927a879197d2195b1f On Tue, 2005-10-25 at 01:05 +0200, pageexec@freemail.hu wrote: > On 24 Oct 2005 at 22:29, Antoine Martin wrote: > > USE="-X mysql sasl ipv6 nptl hardened" > > > > dev-db/mysql-4.1.14 +berkdb -big-tables -cluster -debug -doc -extraengine > > -geometry -minimal +perl +readline +selinux +ssl -static +tcpd -utf8 > > ok, mine's exactly the same except for +selinux (no selinux here). > so it's either that or the hardened toolchain that causes this, > although i don't see from the ebuild nor from the toolchain how > that extra crypto enters the picture. anyone has ideas? also, can > you try to emerge it without selinux and/or the hardened toolchain > (set gcc-config to the normal specs file) and see what happens? if > that cures it, comparing compile/emerge logs might shed a light on > this. Well I cant reproduce this on any other box using a hgcc, so I'm stumped how this user is even hitting this. A proper bug report is probably the best place to take the rest of this thread up. -- solar Gentoo Linux -- gentoo-hardened@gentoo.org mailing list