From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5F72715936D for ; Sun, 24 Nov 2024 22:47:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 29701E08FC for ; Sun, 24 Nov 2024 22:47:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mx1.7thlake.com (mx1.7thlake.com [52.0.20.86]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 63E2DE095F for ; Fri, 15 Apr 2022 13:28:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mx1.7thlake.com (Postfix, from userid 111) id 4D7C176065A; Fri, 15 Apr 2022 09:28:34 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=parallaxshift.com; s=dkim_selector_kant_20191021; t=1650029314; bh=HQW74bckGx7NjWSYJZD+DMBpzkqOVwwpY0hVYDIbfyg=; h=Date:Subject:To:References:From:In-Reply-To; b=HfUM7f449LZJoFVhfRvF89KOOCVzKvM0D+Hp/FPif4JRFelGG8ea8fGQbCPFKt46V o4cha+9x8gsp1kUiPz8EVNZ4qZa9zq7PnT5ojhU80NFuImFj4r5SApuKXHbEHR53Qc AVMRS2Nc9Pt4v6m1DF3E+O2fy23iMLMdli3JEDcU= X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on kant.7thlake.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.6 required=2.9 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,NICE_REPLY_A, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Relay-Country: Received: from [192.168.50.150] (unknown [38.77.22.125]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.7thlake.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 95F0A7602B9; Fri, 15 Apr 2022 09:28:33 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.103.5 at kant DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=parallaxshift.com; s=dkim_selector_kant_20191021; t=1650029313; bh=HQW74bckGx7NjWSYJZD+DMBpzkqOVwwpY0hVYDIbfyg=; h=Date:Subject:To:References:From:In-Reply-To; b=ZfvH3J2q0FTWsuUsVum8wJ1TPd8/mCRDESbtJIw+ISzPEj+A6bmdJTxa3XtiL/j3C jgAkmvp4QUjLretsVPsbksC/BIkmtRIotfMS7MVhKpIsGGpxFeKrIPUzPwLCxIPox9 axtx1/6O0HPDCtJEFAt3+DomdsvnL9AxmuS9ZJZM= Message-ID: <7c43a475-19fa-831d-cbb6-492b00bcd429@parallaxshift.com> Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2022 09:28:33 -0400 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Discussion on the GURU project and repository X-BeenThere: gentoo-guru@gentoo.org X-BeenThere: gentoo-guru@lists.gentoo.org X-Auto-Response-Suppress: DR, RN, NRN, OOF, AutoReply MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.7.0 Subject: Re: [gentoo-guru] Re: Dev branch failing pkgcheck scan Content-Language: en-US To: gentoo-guru@lists.gentoo.org, 1over137 <1over137@anche.no> References: From: Philippe Chaintreuil In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: 1334a54c-44f8-4e89-8117-c88cd9d49698 X-Archives-Hash: 55e60db69233e7ed1f177abc3da8d286 On 4/15/2022 9:22 AM, 1over137 wrote: > Sorry, I think I failed to remove the old ebuild, causing this error. > Simply removing the old ebuild in the folder (ssmtool-0.6.4.ebuild) > would fix it. How do I fix it? Do I simply make a new commit? I can confirm, deleting app-misc/vocabsieve/ssmtool-0.6.4.ebuild makes pkgcheck happy. I'm new here, so I'm not authoritative by any stretch of the imagination, but I'd say just submit a new commit that removes the file. Thanks for the quick response!