From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org)
by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
(envelope-from <gentoo-embedded+bounces-2871-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>)
id 1LgbM0-0004I3-7U
for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 09 Mar 2009 09:00:56 +0000
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C59F4E01FA;
Mon, 9 Mar 2009 09:00:54 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from rv-out-0708.google.com (rv-out-0708.google.com [209.85.198.245])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9993AE01FA
for <gentoo-embedded@lists.gentoo.org>; Mon, 9 Mar 2009 09:00:54 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by rv-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id f25so1662463rvb.46
for <gentoo-embedded@lists.gentoo.org>; Mon, 09 Mar 2009 02:00:54 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:date:message-id:subject
:from:to:content-type;
bh=z3wBda8HboJ1NMoYszzlOuFoayZhbcgDp8wTJvixmj4=;
b=rRLH3jKSpDUR7HbPA20MRgoP53KzyQ29A3eM8b9ZgkrKO8CAqTbz/UFPTzkBe+17ay
z4UNy6YA4x4crTu9e1glQRqVv56ZvyhNCG4+bAKEmGXObxhBRboNyPH99YOtBDq4WD3l
xs1/9DAmKrK1/WYXbqMN30zjfk5TlISgiAtwg=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type;
b=CO3hCzdLJ9lHaAwXWge3KrOrgvw3iF+h2VRaDsmiRLatNgrAYGSN+wNJJB7SCR51GE
ntiAcfapWFMBMvLPQ074PJs8DSxKIeAmKRhw9QDf6GVHAGWtLdSwPvsoLjeM3NSCMUaA
4MoOx2o6OCpngCRYBsEw6QuMVz4FaP/nXtv1g=
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-embedded@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-embedded+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-embedded+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-embedded+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-embedded.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-embedded@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-embedded@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.141.52.6 with SMTP id e6mr2015850rvk.133.1236589254168; Mon,
09 Mar 2009 02:00:54 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Mon, 9 Mar 2009 20:00:54 +1100
Message-ID: <c7d2b5330903090200l6bd5c07pb6a8c8737646c222@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: [gentoo-embedded] ~arm pulls in packages for host system
From: Tim Erwin <taerwin@gmail.com>
To: gentoo-embedded@lists.gentoo.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=000e0cd292063a52ea0464abdffc
X-Archives-Salt: a444719a-3f6a-4d00-8bf5-e7c2f52ab4d8
X-Archives-Hash: bea5dd0ab6772a798cba6a545f864848
--000e0cd292063a52ea0464abdffc
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
I have set up a cross compiler but if I use ~arm in the ACCEPT_KEYWORDS in
/usr/armv4tl-softfloat-linux-gnueabi/etc/make.conf, it wants to pull in
packages for the host system (baselayout, openrc and e2fsprogs-lib) which
are masked by ~amd64. Is there any reason for this? It seems that the host
package version has to match the cross compiled package version. I thought
the crossdev environment would be independent? Is there something that I am
missing (or have done wrong)?
Regards,
Tim
--000e0cd292063a52ea0464abdffc
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
I have set up a cross compiler but if I use ~arm in the ACCEPT_KEYWORDS in /usr/armv4tl-softfloat-linux-gnueabi/etc/make.conf,
it wants to pull in packages for the host system (baselayout, openrc
and e2fsprogs-lib) which are masked by ~amd64. Is there any reason for
this? It seems that the host package version has to match the cross
compiled package version. I thought the crossdev environment would be
independent? Is there something that I am missing (or have done wrong)?<br><div id=":1r5" class="ii gt">
<br>Regards,<br><br>Tim<font color="#888888"><br></font></div>
--000e0cd292063a52ea0464abdffc--