From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1HBQQ6-0008Ta-PK for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 29 Jan 2007 06:55:15 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.8/8.13.8) with SMTP id l0T6sH8B011686; Mon, 29 Jan 2007 06:54:17 GMT Received: from mail.gmx.net (mail.gmx.net [213.165.64.20]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.8/8.13.8) with SMTP id l0T6sG1j011681 for ; Mon, 29 Jan 2007 06:54:16 GMT Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 29 Jan 2007 06:54:15 -0000 Received: from unknown (EHLO mail.bridge.intra) [88.116.127.46] by mail.gmx.net (mp042) with SMTP; 29 Jan 2007 07:54:15 +0100 X-Authenticated: #507653 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B02C387A for ; Mon, 29 Jan 2007 07:54:11 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at bridge.intra Received: from mail.bridge.intra ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 4964eHI2zMec for ; Mon, 29 Jan 2007 07:54:08 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail.bridge.intra (Postfix, from userid 200) id C682F39AC; Mon, 29 Jan 2007 07:54:08 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.bridge.intra (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF9F5387A for ; Mon, 29 Jan 2007 07:54:08 +0100 (CET) Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2007 07:54:08 +0100 (CET) From: "Peter S. Mazinger" To: gentoo-embedded@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-embedded] Re: Appropriate toolchain for a SPARC? In-Reply-To: <1169470281.5178.4.camel@localhost> Message-ID: Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-embedded@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-embedded@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-Archives-Salt: 709cd558-1fa5-46e7-aa4b-3e83433f0de4 X-Archives-Hash: c6a0728d273e66f00e2610b8bf757003 On Mon, 22 Jan 2007, Dimitris Lampridis wrote: > On Sun, 2007-01-21 at 12:16 +0100, Peter S. Mazinger wrote: > > On Fri, 19 Jan 2007, Dimitris Lampridis wrote: > > > > > On Thu, 2007-01-18 at 11:47 +0100, Dimitris Lampridis wrote: > > > > I want to build a cross toolchain on an x86 system, to be able to > > > > compile for SPARC without hardware floating point support, using uclibc. > > > > I've done some attempts already but they all fail (for various reasons). > > > > Up until now, I have not succeeded 100%. So I thought I should do it in > > > > the proper way, starting from the beginning: > > > > > > > > Could you please let me know if there is a specific combination of > > > > binutils, gcc, uclibc etc., that is well-known to work for a > > > > sparc-softfloat-linux-uclibc target? > > > > > > > > thank you in advance, > > > > Dimitris > > > > > > > > PS: I currently try with: > > > > binutils-2.17 > > > > gcc-4.1.1-r3 > > > > linux-headers-2.6.19.2-r1 > > > > uclibc-0.9.28-r2 > > > > > > > > > > nobody yet? Well, I've been trying several combinations of the programs, > > > and they still all fail. I've had success with binutils-2.17, with gcc > > > 3.4.1-r3, 3.4.4-r1 and 4.1.1-r3, but no luck with uclibc. > > > > > > I've tried uclibc 0.9.28-r2, 0.9.28-r1 and 0.9.28 (as well as 0.9.27 > > > that apparently does not support sparc?), and every time they fail on > > > the same problem, complaining about duplicate "_start" symbol in ldso.c. > > > I've attached my uclibc emerge log, hopefully someone can propose > > > something? > > > > > > thank you, > > > Dimitris > > > > you may try to use uclibc-svn (no ebuild for it), some sparc support was > > added. > > > > Peter > > > > -- > > Peter S. Mazinger ID: 0xA5F059F2 > > Key fingerprint = 92A4 31E1 56BC 3D5A 2D08 BB6E C389 975E A5F0 59F2 > > > Hmmm, uclibc from SVN does the trick. I also tried buildroot and I was > able to produce a working toolchain for softfloat SPARC, out of: > binutils-2.6.91.0.7 > linux-kernel-2.6.11 > gcc-3.4.2 > latest snapshot of uclibc > > Thank you Peter for your time, > Dimitris don't rely though on the svn version for production, the locking is housed (many other bugs that I won't even try listing them). Peter -- Peter S. Mazinger ID: 0xA5F059F2 Key fingerprint = 92A4 31E1 56BC 3D5A 2D08 BB6E C389 975E A5F0 59F2 -- gentoo-embedded@gentoo.org mailing list