From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.54) id 1EvziI-0007nm-Df for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 09 Jan 2006 16:17:42 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with SMTP id k09GH112020073; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 16:17:01 GMT Received: from mail.gmx.net (mail.gmx.de [213.165.64.21]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with SMTP id k09GH0Fd021851 for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 16:17:01 GMT Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 09 Jan 2006 16:17:00 -0000 Received: from host-6.mikroweb.hu (EHLO mail.bridge.intra) [193.17.175.6] by mail.gmx.net (mp021) with SMTP; 09 Jan 2006 17:17:00 +0100 X-Authenticated: #507653 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3414FB715 for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 17:16:56 +0100 (CET) Received: from mail.bridge.intra ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (lnx.bridge.intra [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 13277-04 for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 17:16:44 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail.bridge.intra (Postfix, from userid 200) id 8826EB838; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 17:16:44 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.bridge.intra (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E7CAB715 for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 17:16:44 +0100 (CET) Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2006 17:16:43 +0100 (CET) From: "Peter S. Mazinger" To: gentoo-embedded@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-embedded] glibc-2 status In-Reply-To: <1136216733.10878.111.camel@nc> Message-ID: Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-embedded@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-embedded@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at localhost X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-Archives-Salt: c88cac4b-4062-41f7-90e2-bb4051f9d39f X-Archives-Hash: 4d5fc2023c9c409003b11a06128b3802 On Mon, 2 Jan 2006, Natanael Copa wrote: > On man, 2006-01-02 at 16:21 +0100, Peter S. Mazinger wrote: > > On Tue, 27 Dec 2005, solar wrote: > > > > > On Tue, 2005-12-27 at 15:03 -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote: > > > > On Tuesday 27 December 2005 13:02, solar wrote: > > > > > On Tue, 2005-12-27 at 14:36 +0100, Natanael Copa wrote: > > > > > > Anyone who know the status of glibc-2 in embedded? > > > > > > > > > > Assuming you mean glib2 it still remains at the same state. > > > > > This is a sore spot for some of us being that the only problem > > > > > moving forward is coming from another Gentoo developer. > > > > > > > > considering said developer has been afk for quite a while, > > > > > > cough good. > > > > > > > why dont i just go > > > > ahead and include the patch in our ebuilds (especially since upstream has > > > > accepted it) > > > > > > I was unaware it was accepted for glib or even submitted for that > > > matter. But I like your idea. > > > > The patch was only accepted for gtk+, but for glib2 I am sure it won't > > ever be acceptable, because upstream the test for iconv() and nls support > > will stop the build, if they are both not found. > > Why cannot upstream glib2 support non iconv/nls? w/o iconv it is not possible anymore (they removed the "tolerant" way in glib2), nls would be no problem > > > nls is no real problem, because it can be replaced by dummies, yvasilev > > made a better patch for iconv() replacement. > > > > I see the future rather by enabling iconv() in uClibc (but not the > > nls/libintl/gettext stuff). That allows proper glib2 builds and everything > > that depends on it. > > The nls part can be disabled/replaced by dummies in > > glib-2/glib/gi18n[-lib].h, that will allow to solve all glib2 dependant > > apps by: > > sed -i 's:libintl.h:gi18n.h:' > > > > I have built like this all of emerge gnome > > wow... including firefox? both mozilla/firefox Peter -- Peter S. Mazinger ID: 0xA5F059F2 Key fingerprint = 92A4 31E1 56BC 3D5A 2D08 BB6E C389 975E A5F0 59F2 -- gentoo-embedded@gentoo.org mailing list