From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.54) id 1EtRW5-0007rC-9s for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 02 Jan 2006 15:22:33 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with SMTP id k02FKMI8015714; Mon, 2 Jan 2006 15:20:22 GMT Received: from mail.gmx.net (mail.gmx.net [213.165.64.21]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with SMTP id k02FKMe1001380 for ; Mon, 2 Jan 2006 15:20:22 GMT Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 02 Jan 2006 15:21:47 -0000 Received: from host-6.mikroweb.hu (EHLO mail.bridge.intra) [193.17.175.6] by mail.gmx.net (mp010) with SMTP; 02 Jan 2006 16:21:47 +0100 X-Authenticated: #507653 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with ESMTP id D91B9B6D2 for ; Mon, 2 Jan 2006 16:21:45 +0100 (CET) Received: from mail.bridge.intra ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (lnx.bridge.intra [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 25146-08 for ; Mon, 2 Jan 2006 16:21:30 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail.bridge.intra (Postfix, from userid 200) id 21C88B6D3; Mon, 2 Jan 2006 16:21:29 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.bridge.intra (Postfix) with ESMTP id D302AB6D2 for ; Mon, 2 Jan 2006 16:21:29 +0100 (CET) Date: Mon, 2 Jan 2006 16:21:29 +0100 (CET) From: "Peter S. Mazinger" To: gentoo-embedded@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-embedded] glibc-2 status In-Reply-To: <1135716946.8475.33.camel@onyx> Message-ID: Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-embedded@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-embedded@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at localhost X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-Archives-Salt: e630f185-5474-470a-b6f9-e6f66b2e9174 X-Archives-Hash: 15a926707d12e4330a3a040dfa157a72 On Tue, 27 Dec 2005, solar wrote: > On Tue, 2005-12-27 at 15:03 -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote: > > On Tuesday 27 December 2005 13:02, solar wrote: > > > On Tue, 2005-12-27 at 14:36 +0100, Natanael Copa wrote: > > > > Anyone who know the status of glibc-2 in embedded? > > > > > > Assuming you mean glib2 it still remains at the same state. > > > This is a sore spot for some of us being that the only problem > > > moving forward is coming from another Gentoo developer. > > > > considering said developer has been afk for quite a while, > > cough good. > > > why dont i just go > > ahead and include the patch in our ebuilds (especially since upstream has > > accepted it) > > I was unaware it was accepted for glib or even submitted for that > matter. But I like your idea. The patch was only accepted for gtk+, but for glib2 I am sure it won't ever be acceptable, because upstream the test for iconv() and nls support will stop the build, if they are both not found. nls is no real problem, because it can be replaced by dummies, yvasilev made a better patch for iconv() replacement. I see the future rather by enabling iconv() in uClibc (but not the nls/libintl/gettext stuff). That allows proper glib2 builds and everything that depends on it. The nls part can be disabled/replaced by dummies in glib-2/glib/gi18n[-lib].h, that will allow to solve all glib2 dependant apps by: sed -i 's:libintl.h:gi18n.h:' I have built like this all of emerge gnome Peter -- Peter S. Mazinger ID: 0xA5F059F2 Key fingerprint = 92A4 31E1 56BC 3D5A 2D08 BB6E C389 975E A5F0 59F2 -- gentoo-embedded@gentoo.org mailing list