From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1QekX2-0006BH-7T for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 07 Jul 2011 09:06:00 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A4F2421C0CE for ; Thu, 7 Jul 2011 09:05:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-fx0-f52.google.com (mail-fx0-f52.google.com [209.85.161.52]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6DEB21C027 for ; Thu, 7 Jul 2011 08:30:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: by fxd18 with SMTP id 18so852967fxd.11 for ; Thu, 07 Jul 2011 01:30:49 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=oPJo/q6JQsMsX+FlkOMTYU4MjzrT9S92HSGjieMuUT4=; b=vS4oWyF91RvmksM7wFOAkn/Vb+Ahm8ShEpJcwPyaEOdWKM6VGTyU4/3Su/8QWWVGKw 4hSWjEoBSCZsm8CVZGaPy0PGbkBEmRVWl5YCD3FpxwqkTJP7yRd9TzK2fvKpsUwGaTxn CWc0sgxrGKDGxOq2rFjFXLQEnE8HrVWhTn0ic= Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-embedded@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-embedded@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.223.17.151 with SMTP id s23mr895116faa.13.1310027449005; Thu, 07 Jul 2011 01:30:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.223.87.214 with HTTP; Thu, 7 Jul 2011 01:30:48 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4E156330.80101@wildgooses.com> References: <4E156330.80101@wildgooses.com> Date: Thu, 7 Jul 2011 16:30:48 +0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-embedded] Bumping ebuilds From: "Dennis.Yxun" To: gentoo-embedded@lists.gentoo.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=00151747b298be77ac04a77688e0 X-Archives-Salt: X-Archives-Hash: aa30a17df710f557580998e64f0e5b65 --00151747b298be77ac04a77688e0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Hi Ed W: I'm not gentoo dev, and actually not uClibc guy ;-) But I do suggest you file a bug on http://bugs.gentoo.org so people who see may help Dennis On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 3:41 PM, Ed W wrote: > Hi folks > > I'm using gentoo for some "embedded" (actually probably "small" is a > better phrase) builds and have ended up hacking around a number of > ebuilds, uclibc probably being the most interesting one > > Does some developer have time to help get some of these updates pushed > through? I can help with the basic ebuild updates, but I need someone > with inside knowledge to help guide how we handle some of the patching > issues? > > Who is the uclibc maintainer right now? > > (FWIW: uclibc 0.9.32 is a massive improvement over what is in portage > right now. Almost everything compiles out of the box and I even seem to > have iconv/locales support working from uclibc...) > > Thanks > > Ed W > > --00151747b298be77ac04a77688e0 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Ed W:
=C2=A0 I'm not gentoo dev, and actually not uClibc guy ;-)<= br>But I do suggest you file a bug on ht= tp://bugs.gentoo.org
=C2=A0 so people who see may help

Dennis=

On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 3:41 PM, Ed W <lists@wildgooses.com> wrote:
Hi folks

I'm using gentoo for some "embedded" (actually probably "= ;small" is a
better phrase) builds and have ended up hacking around a number of
ebuilds, uclibc probably being the most interesting one

Does some developer have time to help get some of these updates pushed
through? =C2=A0I can help with the basic ebuild updates, but I need someone=
with inside knowledge to help guide how we handle some of the patching
issues?

Who is the uclibc maintainer right now?

(FWIW: uclibc 0.9.32 is a massive improvement over what is in portage
right now. Almost everything compiles out of the box and I even seem to
have iconv/locales support working from uclibc...)

Thanks

Ed W


--00151747b298be77ac04a77688e0--