* [gentoo-embedded] portage patching fails with busybox's patch
@ 2006-06-27 22:28 Joshua ChaitinPollak
2006-06-28 0:22 ` Mike Frysinger
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Joshua ChaitinPollak @ 2006-06-27 22:28 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-embedded
when emerging, portage passes the patch command the -g option, but
busybox doesn't support this and fails. Is there a way to prevent
portage from using -g, or is this a bug I should file?
--
Joshua ChaitinPollak
Software Engineer
Kiva Systems
--
gentoo-embedded@gentoo.org mailing list
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-embedded] portage patching fails with busybox's patch
2006-06-27 22:28 [gentoo-embedded] portage patching fails with busybox's patch Joshua ChaitinPollak
@ 2006-06-28 0:22 ` Mike Frysinger
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Mike Frysinger @ 2006-06-28 0:22 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-embedded; +Cc: Joshua ChaitinPollak
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 403 bytes --]
On Tuesday 27 June 2006 18:28, Joshua ChaitinPollak wrote:
> when emerging, portage passes the patch command the -g option, but
> busybox doesn't support this and fails. Is there a way to prevent
> portage from using -g
edit EPATCH_OPTS in /usr/portage/eclass/eutils.eclass
> or is this a bug I should file?
certainly not, unless you file the bug with busybox to add support for -g
-mike
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 827 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2006-06-28 0:20 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2006-06-27 22:28 [gentoo-embedded] portage patching fails with busybox's patch Joshua ChaitinPollak
2006-06-28 0:22 ` Mike Frysinger
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox