From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org)
	by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <gentoo-embedded+bounces-3932-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>)
	id 1QCYx3-00012I-PQ
	for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 20 Apr 2011 15:04:22 +0000
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4EB111C051
	for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Wed, 20 Apr 2011 15:04:21 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-gx0-f181.google.com (mail-gx0-f181.google.com [209.85.161.181])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A58511C01A
	for <gentoo-embedded@lists.gentoo.org>; Wed, 20 Apr 2011 14:23:58 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by gxk9 with SMTP id 9so274105gxk.40
        for <gentoo-embedded@lists.gentoo.org>; Wed, 20 Apr 2011 07:23:58 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date
         :message-id:subject:to:content-type;
        bh=dI021ZS3wIE1s4zXKdKPgtWKQF23P1CG/I+vi8ZEFn8=;
        b=oqzCCw1v/KwckKSi27bK3SiAcVlQ/zKdAqsqzTWiBDKJDY2bTcgV1yyczkEFPJKgHx
         TZTzjaGyItJlFlzVzf+7qZS887Db0sopwMGRllrb0kyfhZd0qV4xq3ttV2euL510zjr+
         5oha3TdiG5ptFVT8CdRn6vH0h7w2pWYOhY0kg=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to
         :content-type;
        b=EmmqLFpoUFvRFWu2w+XeIeCRS23x/z3L23H2Ej7Bqb+VE+7ljxB6f1IhsCPKNcGKfP
         +Gj/j63/ZbHGVCp5HyHUiROz6vV2Oz/PJV5o+bYf0MlVyp6ajqOGLuit09YhsMstjh2C
         eXxLIrrzhz+rc6hp+qkPXJ5LIXBHgr52H//u8=
Received: by 10.90.168.7 with SMTP id q7mr6420847age.89.1303309438092; Wed, 20
 Apr 2011 07:23:58 -0700 (PDT)
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-embedded@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-embedded+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-embedded+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-embedded+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-embedded.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-embedded@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-embedded@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.90.26.7 with HTTP; Wed, 20 Apr 2011 07:23:38 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <BANLkTim0K7NBdK8cfND+ZqzJPMOFSdjGdg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <BANLkTins3N-9fMsfoeU-Lq6SeoGbp1rhSA@mail.gmail.com>
 <BANLkTimjx4Rjh-=V6-M+cy0AvjE1PmRP9Q@mail.gmail.com> <BANLkTint=D3SubE3HaTrTom-c6kdq0n-ZQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <201104101239.07511.vapier@gentoo.org> <BANLkTimVtgCDyDjY-uo9qKS8D+CcSHFJgQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <op.vtsps1fa5r3cwo@lithium.bad.lv> <4DA44B04.1080102@wildgooses.com>
 <BANLkTimDD-6wG_cN7jp0D0TuOrDPgbv_1w@mail.gmail.com> <BANLkTik1N-a0kPJiuy1mRtBitHUhi8KyTg@mail.gmail.com>
 <4DA84533.6080900@tampabay.rr.com> <BANLkTim0K7NBdK8cfND+ZqzJPMOFSdjGdg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Christopher Friedt <chrisfriedt@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2011 10:23:38 -0400
Message-ID: <BANLkTimCBOBAnXWjQ+YwL9f4XJBscHdC5w@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-embedded] gcc-4.6 / bionic
To: gentoo-embedded@lists.gentoo.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-Archives-Salt: 
X-Archives-Hash: d8430d2e4ebc44db00f7cb9909dd7488

localhost ~ # x86_64-pc-linux-bionic-gcc -static -m32
-specs=specfile.txt -o hi hi.c
localhost ~ # ./hi
Hello, Bionic World!

bwahaha... bwahahaha... (insert pinky into corner of mouth here)

1) Fix internal specs (had to manually adjust for crts startfile/endfile)
2) make it work for -m64 by default

C

On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 11:46 AM, Christopher Friedt
<chrisfriedt@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi James,
>
> On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 9:16 AM, wireless <wireless@tampabay.rr.com> wrote:
>> On 04/15/11 08:42, Christopher Friedt wrote:
>> Thanks for the update on your progress. I ran across this interesting
>> article, where Google is trying to influence ARM offering and more
>> on licensing:
>
> I think Google's intention here is really just to reduce fragmentation
> of Android between Open Handset Alliance members (i.e. manufacturers).
> It's good in that it eliminates duplicate work between companies
> targeting Android as a platform and there will be a common base
> platform. They likely still have a lot of internal code cleanup to do
> after pushing to get Honeycomb out the door.
>
> Just to clarify, I'm not planning on doing "Android" development here
> - I'm just using Bionic. Anyone interested in Android _really_ should
> adhere to upstream's build system.
>
> C
>