From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Fpti0-0006ym-GL for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 12 Jun 2006 21:12:29 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.6/8.13.6) with SMTP id k5CL7WrG015743; Mon, 12 Jun 2006 21:07:32 GMT Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com (nf-out-0910.google.com [64.233.182.191]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k5CL7VBR010736 for ; Mon, 12 Jun 2006 21:07:31 GMT Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id c2so516203nfe for ; Mon, 12 Jun 2006 14:07:31 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=IV9HPTucq6XfCrF6oJkxlmatq8hXluXHbmbrVl3hZbl9QNH0S2omDgbki25/HoFvOxX8b378jecPtDQeiPMpm6ll0V7DErLeCf6AevvTU4e3q/6f2YYWQLXxjQLuIYnxzrig2R4rN2lAMKt6TDKdRKNe9eZCntpIakRc6+x2VVY= Received: by 10.48.208.18 with SMTP id f18mr5212327nfg; Mon, 12 Jun 2006 14:07:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.48.219.5 with HTTP; Mon, 12 Jun 2006 14:07:31 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <7ff566830606121407m2aa0c6er643027d7c082f362@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2006 17:07:31 -0400 From: "Kelly Price" To: gentoo-embedded@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-embedded] 2006.x stage3 uclibc In-Reply-To: <1150144697.29093.33.camel@onyx> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-embedded@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-embedded@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <1150144697.29093.33.camel@onyx> X-Archives-Salt: 7a6d58cf-37fb-455b-82de-b63b1e755864 X-Archives-Hash: 10f2bd0703954658bedecdce15e5759c On 6/12/06, Ned Ludd wrote: > On Mon, 2006-06-12 at 17:01 -0300, Douglas Campos wrote: > > any news about it? > > It's so late in the year that we probably wont bother with a 2006.0 but > will do a 2006.1 ; I've been maintaining a binary repos which can aid in > the install process. If you make me aware of what particular > architecture you are after I'm happy to post pseudo stages made from > doing ROOT=/somedir emerge -Ke system and tar-balling that CHOST up. > So a Gentoo-Lite 2006.1 on a i586 host will be possible? Did they fix the sandbox issues? -- Kelly "STrRedWolf" Price http://strredwolf.furrynet.com -- gentoo-embedded@gentoo.org mailing list