public inbox for gentoo-embedded@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ed W <lists@wildgooses.com>
To: gentoo-embedded@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-embedded] Some good words for Gentoo embedded?
Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2010 14:58:56 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4D10C0B0.8010602@wildgooses.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTi=J=1rvh7PqvH-24UUY1Q6whd_amXhcFm7AZ19M@mail.gmail.com>

On 09/12/2010 20:18, Kfir Lavi wrote:
> Hi,
> I'm using Gentoo for few years now, and had some experience in the 
> past with Gentoo embedded.
> Now I'm facing a customer that wants explanation why using Gentoo as 
> an embedded system will be a good choice.
> How do you shrink a 10 years experience to half an hour talk to people 
> that think Ubuntu is a good embedded choice.
> I'm guessing they will ask for type of distros for embedded compared 
> to Gentoo.
> From my head I know just by name Buildroot and Montavista.
>
> What will be the major points I need to  make in order to convert 
> their minds from Ubuntu to Gentoo embedded?
> Could you share also some of your experience with Gentoo Embedded?
>
> Thinking about it, its very hard for me to contemplate in words "Why 
> Gentoo?" for people that don't understand Linux, but are educated and 
> very experienced in software.

I do get the impression that when people start talking about "distros" 
they usually loose sight that they are all 98% the same software, only 
slightly different versions and perhaps slightly different config 
files... Now for sure that can make a visible difference, especially the 
default configs for desktop apps, but one way or another, the question 
is really about the "best" way to get a bunch of software compiled and 
installed on your device?

I like gentoo for situations where:
- Skilled developer available
- Customisable solution is desired
- Tightly controlled deployment environment
- Repeatable build environment required

I think gentoo is far less acceptable if there isn't a skilled developer 
available to help maintain and develop it... Probably that's my main 
suggestion on how to size your project?

However, if that developer/administrator is available, then Gentoo is a 
marvellous solution for quickly building few MB custom solution, or a 
60MB virtual server base installation, or whatever other customised 
environment you desire?

Good luck

Ed W



  parent reply	other threads:[~2010-12-21 15:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-12-09 20:18 [gentoo-embedded] Some good words for Gentoo embedded? Kfir Lavi
2010-12-09 21:42 ` Peter Stuge
2010-12-09 23:02 ` David Ford
2010-12-30  6:52   ` Enrico Weigelt
2010-12-30  7:17     ` Peter Stuge
2010-12-30 10:49       ` Enrico Weigelt
2010-12-21 14:58 ` Ed W [this message]
2010-12-21 16:20   ` Peter Stuge
2010-12-23  8:34     ` Kfir Lavi
2010-12-23 11:17   ` [gentoo-embedded] virtual server profile Arkadi Shishlov
2011-02-26 11:58     ` Ed W

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4D10C0B0.8010602@wildgooses.com \
    --to=lists@wildgooses.com \
    --cc=gentoo-embedded@lists.gentoo.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox