From: wireless <wireless@tampabay.rr.com>
To: gentoo-embedded@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-embedded] OSWALD
Date: Thu, 05 Aug 2010 12:20:38 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4C5AE4D6.4080703@tampabay.rr.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100803164603.GD28736@freyja.radhermit.com>
Previously you wrote:
> On 2010-08-02 Mon 08:03, wireless wrote:
>> Congratulations to whoever is working this behind the scenes......
>
> Thanks, I've been the main software dev behind the OSWALD and have
> enjoyed using Gentoo for a number of years now. I thought the OSWALD
> would be a great way to help forward the embedded side of Gentoo.
>
> I'm hoping to soon start contributing back some of the ebuilds and other
> software I've developed along the way for the OSWALD since I'm only a
> week or two away from becoming an official Gentoo dev.
>
> Currently the project looks a little dead since we are between funding
> cycles and are looking to produce more devices so we have more stock on
> hand. However, we've secured funds to continue expanding the project
> this next school year and I'll continue working on the software side of
> things.
This is good to know. Have you categorized your current
(ARM) device to be similar to other boards, maybe the beagle?
>> Now, were do we, the rank and file hackers, purchase a OSWALD embedded
>> dev kit from? In the article they seem to indicate that larger
>> production runs are in the offerings to come?
>
> If you're interested, I could probably hook a couple more Gentoo
> embedded devs with OSWALDs at reduced prices. We currently have a
> limited supply on hand due to previous manufacturing and funding issues,
> but there are probably enough to hand a few out, especially if you
> contribute back to the OSWALD project.
Thanks for the generosity, but, I need to finish a few
things that have been lagging for me, before I jump into
anything else. That said, I'm interested in the next board,
if it is ARM based.
> Also, we are currently looking into the next hardware platform that the
> device will be based on in future years. I'm all for continuing with the
> upcoming OMAP4 platform, but we'll see where things go.
OMAP-4 looks very cool:
http://focus.ti.com/general/docs/wtbu/wtbuproductcontent.tsp?contentId=53243&navigationId=12843&templateId=6123
Keep us posted on the new board's processor direction.
Thanks for all of the information.
James
prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-08-05 17:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-08-02 15:03 [gentoo-embedded] OSWALD wireless
2010-08-03 1:59 ` solar
2010-08-03 3:23 ` wireless
2010-08-03 4:27 ` solar
2010-08-03 17:20 ` Tim Harder
2010-08-03 3:28 ` wireless
2010-08-03 16:46 ` Tim Harder
2010-08-05 16:20 ` wireless [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4C5AE4D6.4080703@tampabay.rr.com \
--to=wireless@tampabay.rr.com \
--cc=gentoo-embedded@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox