public inbox for gentoo-embedded@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ed W <lists@wildgooses.com>
To: gentoo-embedded@lists.gentoo.org
Cc: flameeyes@gentoo.org
Subject: [gentoo-embedded] ref bug 297229 (virutal/libiconv vs sys-libs/uclibc[iconv] vs sys-devel/gcc)
Date: Thu, 03 Jun 2010 11:42:24 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4C078710.8060808@wildgooses.com> (raw)

Hi, replying here rather than on the bug tracker, but please set me 
straight if it's better discussed elsewhere?


(In reply to comment #11 - Diego)
 > The problem is not build, the problem is that if libiconv is removed 
_after_
 > gcc is merged… it breaks.
 >

I have seen you and others note this several times (and the reason why 
seems clear), however, what I don't get is why this is any different to 
the normal situation with glibc?

Q: Why would libiconv ever be uninstalled/removed?

Q: After installing libiconv and rebuilding gettext/gcc, the upgrade 
process to a new libiconv presumably then becomes, 1) upgrade libiconv, 
2) rebuild gettext/gcc, 3) delete old libiconv libraries? Sounds bearable?

Is the problem that under glibc there is no dependency created at all 
with regards to iconv, but if libiconv is floating around then there is 
a dep created? And subsequently it's "hard" to avoid recompiles of gcc 
picking up libiconv, hence ever removing that dependency?

Is this basically the same issue with gettext on uclibc?

I guess the real question here is what's the best way to build glib 
under uclibc? Recommendations please?

Thanks

Ed W




             reply	other threads:[~2010-06-03 11:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-06-03 10:42 Ed W [this message]
2010-06-03 23:02 ` [gentoo-embedded] ref bug 297229 (virutal/libiconv vs sys-libs/uclibc[iconv] vs sys-devel/gcc) Ned Ludd
2010-06-04 11:44   ` Ed W
2010-06-04 15:56     ` Peter Stuge
2010-06-04 23:20     ` solar
2010-06-07 10:20       ` Ed W

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4C078710.8060808@wildgooses.com \
    --to=lists@wildgooses.com \
    --cc=flameeyes@gentoo.org \
    --cc=gentoo-embedded@lists.gentoo.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox