From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from <gentoo-embedded+bounces-3459-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>) id 1O2auf-0002QW-IX for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 16 Apr 2010 02:04:15 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0C400E09E5 for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Fri, 16 Apr 2010 02:04:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from hrndva-omtalb.mail.rr.com (hrndva-omtalb.mail.rr.com [71.74.56.125]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6329E0870 for <gentoo-embedded@lists.gentoo.org>; Fri, 16 Apr 2010 01:22:11 +0000 (UTC) X-Authority-Analysis: v=1.1 cv=E9k1WvbCwWjFc1mtZtTZCb4xMnZJ3NelAETgZ6iwC6Q= c=1 sm=0 a=RMdmPurJSFcA:10 a=8nJEP1OIZ-IA:10 a=ycB087cP/TvZCXFoqgOVhQ==:17 a=hVT11HxsvAgbunQhLWIA:9 a=wD8Vk5myVl5rMehvT4R549b1QIEA:4 a=wPNLvfGTeEIA:10 a=ycB087cP/TvZCXFoqgOVhQ==:117 X-Cloudmark-Score: 0 X-Originating-IP: 71.40.157.251 Received: from [71.40.157.251] ([71.40.157.251:56816] helo=[192.168.2.37]) by hrndva-oedge02.mail.rr.com (envelope-from <wireless@tampabay.rr.com>) (ecelerity 2.2.2.39 r()) with ESMTP id 14/58-28834-3CBB7CB4; Fri, 16 Apr 2010 01:22:11 +0000 Message-ID: <4BC7B9D2.3080600@tampabay.rr.com> Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2010 21:13:54 -0400 From: wireless <wireless@tampabay.rr.com> User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.8.1.23) Gecko/20100301 SeaMonkey/1.1.18 Precedence: bulk List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-embedded@lists.gentoo.org> List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-embedded+help@lists.gentoo.org> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-embedded+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org> List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-embedded+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org> List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-embedded.gentoo.org> X-BeenThere: gentoo-embedded@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-embedded@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-embedded@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-embedded] arm router with 3 ports References: <4BB4984E.5060806@tampabay.rr.com> <201004012220.59460.jsyrytczyk@uni.opole.pl> <4BB51867.6060809@wildgooses.com> <201004022314.16455.jsyrytczyk@uni.opole.pl> <4BBA4A53.3030309@tampabay.rr.com> <4BBA5893.4000904@gmail.com> <4BBA6808.1020302@tampabay.rr.com> <4BBCC672.5090103@gmail.com> <4BBCCD67.8080307@tampabay.rr.com> <4BC73279.4020607@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <4BC73279.4020607@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: 6d8a3f48-e713-43b5-98d5-29654eedf3ad X-Archives-Hash: cd5c35dabc043ac8ef45324ffc3aa517 Arkadi Shishlov wrote: > Isn't C64+ sufficient for H.264? Especially if its OMAP4? Yes. However, if you include a chip from a vendor, such as TI, then there are never every any royalties due. Much todo about h.264 royalties buzzing on the net. Beside a h.264 chip and Arm is very low power and the h.264 chip solution can be put to sleep, thus drawing nano-amps..... James