From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1O2RbF-0005Bi-Tl for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 15 Apr 2010 16:07:30 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 82130E095C for ; Thu, 15 Apr 2010 16:07:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.hosting.lv (mail.hosting.lv [213.21.217.83]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BA37E0898 for ; Thu, 15 Apr 2010 15:36:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [87.246.143.141] by mail.hosting.lv with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) id 1O2R7I-000O2h-Fh; Thu, 15 Apr 2010 18:36:32 +0300 Message-ID: <4BC73279.4020607@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2010 18:36:25 +0300 From: Arkadi Shishlov User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.1.9) Gecko/20100317 Thunderbird/3.0.4 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-embedded@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-embedded@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-embedded@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-embedded] arm router with 3 ports References: <4BB4984E.5060806@tampabay.rr.com> <201004012220.59460.jsyrytczyk@uni.opole.pl> <4BB51867.6060809@wildgooses.com> <201004022314.16455.jsyrytczyk@uni.opole.pl> <4BBA4A53.3030309@tampabay.rr.com> <4BBA5893.4000904@gmail.com> <4BBA6808.1020302@tampabay.rr.com> <4BBCC672.5090103@gmail.com> <4BBCCD67.8080307@tampabay.rr.com> In-Reply-To: <4BBCCD67.8080307@tampabay.rr.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: 86b27e5b-5ce4-40c4-bebb-108ce675636c X-Archives-Hash: 96ddb77228b9c5aa657af6e03faa2399 On 04/07/10 21:22, wireless wrote: > Arkadi Shishlov wrote: >> On 04/06/10 01:45, wireless wrote: >>> such, but, I'm thinking more along the Cortex A9 family >>> of processors.... >>> >> http://focus.ti.com/general/docs/wtbu/wtbuproductcontent.tsp?templateId=6123&navigationId=12843&contentId=53243 >> >> Are they only available for professional developers of big companies right now? >> Must wait for BeagleBoard to migrate to OMAP4. >> BTW, if I want to hack on Tegra/Tegra2 or Snapdragon what is my option? Purchase >> a consumer device, which one? Any suggestions? > Once I get 'the sale pitch from TI' I'll post back, if you > like. I have a strong relationship with TI and they have not > dissapointed me in the past. I'm not sure what I'm after is > a dev board that is in the price range of the Beagle, but, > when I spin boards, the cost will approach the Beagle boards. > > If other have an interest, we could combine our needs and > spin a common board, then folks that want one, just pay me > for (my) cost on the boards. No layout or design time > charge, just trying to get the quantity up to a dozen or so... I'll keep that in mind, but I'm waiting for a more mainstream BB with A9. No rush. :) Please post your progress anyway. > I put H.264 hardware solutions on the boards too, so that > runs up the costs. TI says it's very low now, but, I'm > waiting to hear my costs...... Isn't C64+ sufficient for H.264? Especially if its OMAP4?