From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Nwd3u-0002m8-3M for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 30 Mar 2010 15:09:02 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id AD16AE0D9A for ; Tue, 30 Mar 2010 15:09:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail1.nippynetworks.com (mail1.nippynetworks.com [212.227.250.41]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52405E09F8 for ; Tue, 30 Mar 2010 14:30:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (mail1.nippynetworks.com [127.0.0.1]) by mail1.nippynetworks.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC0E9B5A802 for ; Tue, 30 Mar 2010 15:30:09 +0100 (BST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at nippynetworks.com Received: from mail1.nippynetworks.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail1.nippynetworks.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 2rxzxUbypQeW for ; Tue, 30 Mar 2010 15:30:09 +0100 (BST) Received: from eds-mbp.wildgooses.local (office.nippynetworks.com [94.194.201.187]) (Authenticated sender: edward@wildgooses.com) by mail1.nippynetworks.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B03CBB5A58C for ; Tue, 30 Mar 2010 15:30:09 +0100 (BST) Message-ID: <4BB20AF1.9050201@wildgooses.com> Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2010 15:30:09 +0100 From: Ed W User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Lightning/1.0b1 Thunderbird/3.0.3 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-embedded@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-embedded@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-embedded@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-embedded] help in choosing DB engine for embedded application References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: 855f8125-9d00-4e04-add0-e3ae66d30d98 X-Archives-Hash: 8c1cc4034a515d0b9f6aab8189f2cdc2 On 30/03/2010 14:24, Mirage ha wrote: > > Dear All, > > I do not know if this is the correct place to post this question or > not but as you have experience in embedded field i expected > you will help me. > > I facing a problem in choosing database engine for my application my > manager suggested to use files (e.g. txt files ) , i suggested to use > berkeley db. > So could you tell me which is better and if there is better solution ( > better db engine) please tell me. > also if there is link to good database benchmark comparison please > send it. Always depends on your requirements for speed, convenience, features, crash recovery, insert/delete patterns, etc... Ed W