From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from <gentoo-embedded+bounces-1222-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@gentoo.org>) id 1GLfsS-000691-Ij for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 08 Sep 2006 12:54:37 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.8/8.13.6) with SMTP id k88Crars023004; Fri, 8 Sep 2006 12:53:36 GMT Received: from mail.gmx.net (mail.gmx.de [213.165.64.20]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.8/8.13.6) with SMTP id k88CrZfL015125 for <gentoo-embedded@lists.gentoo.org>; Fri, 8 Sep 2006 12:53:35 GMT Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 08 Sep 2006 12:53:35 -0000 Received: from softbank218134080092.bbtec.net (EHLO [192.168.11.12]) [218.134.80.92] by mail.gmx.net (mp027) with SMTP; 08 Sep 2006 14:53:35 +0200 X-Authenticated: #10036169 Message-ID: <450167CA.7010409@gmx.net> Date: Fri, 08 Sep 2006 21:53:30 +0900 From: Harald Kubota <hkubota@gmx.net> User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.2 (X11/20060516) Precedence: bulk List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-embedded@lists.gentoo.org> List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-embedded+help@gentoo.org> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-embedded+unsubscribe@gentoo.org> List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-embedded+subscribe@gentoo.org> List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-embedded.gentoo.org> X-BeenThere: gentoo-embedded@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-embedded@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-embedded@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-embedded] sh4-gentoo-linux-uclibc-sh4-gentoo-linux-uclibc-gcc? References: <44FC8592.5060507@gmx.net> <200609041805.01595.vapier@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <200609041805.01595.vapier@gentoo.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-Archives-Salt: 907d0f87-3996-4770-b7e8-c7a6917c1e91 X-Archives-Hash: b716533302af579c2696dad920abed06 Mike Frysinger wrote: > try doing `rm /usr/bin/sh4-gentoo-linux-uclibc-*` and then running > `gcc-config` and see if the wrappers come back > no issue at all. I can remove them, the compiler still works as expected and gcc-config, which never displayed those, still works without flaw. So wherever it comes from, it does not affect anything it seems. As it's just a cosmetic problem, don't worry about it. I know I don't :-) Harald -- gentoo-embedded@gentoo.org mailing list